Why is Multi-Business Forestry Needed to Overcome the Low Performance of Forestry Governance and Food Security in Indonesia?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v8i2.32529Keywords:
Multi business forestry, Forestry governance, System dynamic, Multi-criterion decision-making, Land optimizationAbstract
The 0.6% contribution of the forestry sector to GDP is considered very low despite 64.1% of Indonesia's land area being allocated as forests. Most of the 64.8% production forest allocated is not yet optimized for strengthening national food security, in which Indonesia is ranked 65th in the world. Therefore, an innovative forest management system is needed to synergize timber and non-timber production. This paper presents a multi-business forestry (Mb-F) implementation strategy analyzed through a dynamic system-based multi-criterion decision-making tool named Super Model Mb-F (SM Mb-F). SM Mb-F is built based on a causal loop diagram (CLD), which describes the dynamic relationship between land typology suitability and decisions related to the type of business, commodities, land use area, workload, and financing for many variables relating to 5M business principles and sustainability. Results showed that CLD formulated in 280 sub-models in a total of 4,764 decision variables with an error deviation of 6.4%. The SM Mb-F simulation on two sample concession units produces a projected increase in wood supply, employment, and state revenue, plus the provision of new functions such as food, NTFP, and environmental services. These benefits are obtained by business feasibility. Assuming that gradually until 2030, the Mb-F can be implemented in 32% of Indonesia's production forests, then by 2045, it is projected that there will be an increase in wood production by 296.8%, state revenue by 654.3%, and labor absorption by 985.7%, as well as adding food production up to 19.36 M tons. This is because the land use efficiency of the current operation of forest concessions following the Annual Allowable Cut (AAC) under the selective cutting and replanting system in Indonesia (TPTI) is only about 3% of the total area of forest concession. Assuming the cutting cycle is 35 years, timber could be extracted in 1/35 of the total forest concession area. Implementing Mb-F will significantly improve the land use efficiency from about 3% to 90%. The Mb-F will also restrain the rate of decline in carbon stocks, which is deeper if governance is still under the BAU scenario. This research suggests further global research, emphasizing the importance of innovative models for sustainable forestry governance and food security worldwide.
References
Adalina, Y., Nurrochmat, D. R., Darusman, D., & Sundawati, L. (2014). Harvesting of non-timber forest products by the local communities in Mount Halimun-Salak National Park, West Java, Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 20(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.20.2.103
Affandi, O., Kartodihardjo, H., Nugroho, B., & Ekawati, S. (2021). Institutional analysis of forest governance after the implementation of Law Number 23/2014 in North Sumatra Province, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 5(2), 304-325. https://doi.org/ 10.24259/fs.v5i2.8755
Andrianto, A., Komarudin, H., & Pacheco, P. (2019). Expansion of oil palm plantations in Indonesia’s frontier: Problems of externalities and the future of local and indigenous communities. Land, 8(4), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8040056
Aryee, J., & Hansen, A. S. (2022). De-politicization of digital systems for trade facilitation at the port of tema: A soft systems methodology approach. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(1), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.20 21. 11.009
Astuti, E.W., Hidayat, A., & Nurrochmat, D.R. (2020). Community forest scheme: Measuring impact in livelihood. Case study Lombok Tengah Regency, West Nusa Tenggara province. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 26(1), 52–58. https:// doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.26.1.52
Bala, B. K., Arshad, F. M., & Noh, K. M. (2018). System Dynamics: Modelling and Simulation. Springer.
Barrette, M., Leblanc, M., Thiffault, N., Paquette, A., Lavoie, L., Belanger, L., ... & Deshaies, M. E. (2014). Issues and solutions for the intensive forestry plantations in a context of ecosystem management. Forestry Chronicle, 90(6), 732-747. http://dx.doi.org/10.5558/tfc2014-147
Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejor.2009.01.021
Akram Bhatti, M., & Xi, L. C. (2006). Modeling and Simulation of Dynamic Systems. Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(4), 950-954. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2006. 950.954
Bonny, S. (2019). Ecologically intensive agriculture: Nature and challenges. Cahiers Agricultures, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2011.0526
BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2019). Statistics of Forestry Production 2019. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS – Statistics Indonesia).
BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2020a). Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS – Statistics Indonesia)
BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2020b). Statistics Of Forestry Production 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS – Statistics Indonesia).
Brans, J. P., & De Smet, Y. (2016). PROMETHEE methods. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 233, 187-219. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_6
Carlson, K. M., Heilmayr, R., Gibbs, H. K., Noojipady, P., Burns, D. N., Morton, D. C., ... & Kremen, C. (2018). Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704728114
de Silva, C. W. (2020). Modeling of Dynamic Systems. In Modeling and Control of Engineering Systems. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420076875-8
Duffy, C., Toth, G. G., Hagan, R. P., McKeown, P. C., Rahman, S. A., Widyaningsih, Y., ... & Spillane, C. (2021). Agroforestry contributions to smallholder farmer food security in Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 95(6), 1109-1124. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/ s10457-021-00632-8
EIU. (2021). Global Food Security Index 2020; Addressing structural inequalities to build strong and sustainable food systems. EIU.
Ekayani, M., Nurrochmat, D. R., Saharjo, B. H., & Erbaugh, J.T. (2015). Assessing conformity of scientific voices and local needs to combat forest fire in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 21(2), 83-92. https://doi.org/ 10.7226/jtfm.21.2.83
Fanelli, R. M. (2019). The (un)sustainability of the land use practices and agricultural production in EU countries. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 76(2), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2018.1560761
FAO. (2020). World Food and Agriculture - Statistical Yearbook 2020. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1329en
Fauzi, A. (2019). Teknik analisis keberlanjutan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Fisher, L. A., Kim, Y. S., Latifah, S., & Mukarom, M. (2017). Managing forest conflicts: perspectives of Indonesia's forest management unit directors. Forest and Society, 1(1), 8-26. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i1.772
Fisher, M. R., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2019). The politics, economies, and ecologies of Indonesia’s third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section. Forest and Society, 3(1), 152-170. https://doi.org/10.24259/ fs.v3i1.6348
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., ... & Zaks, D. P. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369), 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452
GFRA. (2020). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020. GFRA. https://doi.org/10.40 60/ca8753en
Grant, W. E. (1998). Ecology and natural resource management: Reflections from a systems perspective. Ecological Modelling, 108(1–3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S 0304-3800(98)00019-2
Gürlük, S., & Uzel, G. (2016). An evaluation of agri-environmental indicators through a multi-criteria decision-making tool in Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Turkey. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1 5244/pjoes/62127
Holt, D. V., & Osman, M. (2017). Approaches to cognitive modeling in dynamic systems control. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 267074. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.201 7.02032
ISEE. (2021). Isee system. ISEE.
Izraelov, M., & Silber, J. (2019). An assessment of the global food security index. Food Security, 11(5), 1135-1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00941-y
Jablonsky, J. (2014). MS Excel based software support tools for decision problems with multiple criteria. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 251-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00342-6
Kassa, H., Dondeyne, S., Poesen, J., Frankl, A., & Nyssen, J. (2017). Transition from Forest-based to Cereal-based Agricultural Systems: A Review of the Drivers of Land use Change and Degradation in Southwest Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development, 28(2), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2575
Kindler, E. (2016). A comparison of the concepts: Ecosystem services and forest functions to improve interdisciplinary exchange. Forest Policy and Economics, 67, 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.011
Kremen, C. (2015). Reframing the land‐sparing/land‐sharing debate for biodiversity conservation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1355(1), 52-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12845
Lambin, E. F., Meyfroidt, P., E. F. Lambin, & P. Meyfroidt. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(9), 3465–3472. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100480108
Loconto, A., Desquilbet, M., Moreau, T., Couvet, D., & Dorin, B. (2020). The land sparing – land sharing controversy: Tracing the politics of knowledge. Land Use Policy, 96, 103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.014
Maladi, Y. (2013). Kajian hukum kritis alih fungsi lahan hutan berorientasi kapitalis. Dinamika Hukum, 13, 109–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2013.13.1.160
Malik, A., & Nainggolan, S. (2020). Factors affecting the import of soybean in Indonesia. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah, 8(5), 523-530. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v8i5.11015
Margono, B. A., Potapov, P. V., Turubanova, S., Stolle, F., & Hansen, M. C. (2014). Primary forest cover loss in Indonesia over 2000–2012. Nature climate change, 4(8), 730-735. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2277
Martauli, E. D. (2018). Analysis of coffee production in Indonesia. JASc (Journal of Agribusiness Sciences), 1(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.30596/jasc.v1i2.1962
Martin, D. A., Osen, K., Grass, I., Hölscher, D., Tscharntke, T., Wurz, A., & Kreft, H. (2020). Land‐use history determines ecosystem services and conservation value in tropical agroforestry. Conservation Letters, 13(5), e12740. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/conl.12740
Mazya, T. M., Nurrochmat, D. R., Kolopaking, L. M., Satria, A., & Dharmawan, A. H. (2023). Finding a Neue Gemeinschaft in rural Indonesia: A discussion of forest community digital transformation. Forest Policy and Economics, 148, 102913. https://doi.org/110.1016/j.forpol.2023.102913
Miyamoto, M. (2020). Poverty reduction saves forests sustainably: Lessons for deforestation policies. World Development, 127, 104746. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.worlddev.2019.104746
MoEF. (2019a). Lembaga Konservasi. Regulation of Minister of Environment and Forestry (MoEF) No. P.22/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/5/2019). Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Nomor 578. http://jdih.menlhk.co.id/ uploads/files/P_22_2019_Lembaga_Konservasi_menlhk_09162019152331.pdf
MoEF. (2019b). Rencana Kehutanan Tingkat Nasional Tahun 2011-2030 (Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Nomor 928).
MoEF. (2019c). Statistik Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan Tahun 2018. Pusat Data dan Informasi. Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan / Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MoEF). Jakarta.
Miyamoto, M. (2020). Poverty reduction saves forests sustainably: Lessons for deforestation policies. World Development, 127, 104746. https://doi.org/10.185 17/ijas eit.6.3.741
Nölte, A., Meilby, H., & Yousefpour, R. (2018). Multi-purpose forest management in the tropics: Incorporating values of carbon, biodiversity and timber in managing Tectona grandis (teak) plantations in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management, 422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.036
Nurfatriani, F., Ramawati, Sari, G. K., & Komarudin, H. (2019). Optimization of crude palm oil fund to support smallholder oil palm replanting in reducing deforestation in Indonesia. Sustainability, 11(18), 4914. https://doi.org/10.33 90/su11184914
Nurrochmat, D. R., Pribadi, R., Siregar, H., Justianto, A., & Park, M. S. (2021). Transformation of agro-forest management policy under the dynamic circumstances of a two-decade regional autonomy in Indonesia. Forests, 12(4), 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040419
Nurrochmat, D. R., Nurrochmat, N. A., Tarigan, S., Siregar, I. Z., Rizki, D. L. Y., Radjawali, I., & Sulistio, H. (2023). Indonesia's options in becoming a high-income country: Accelerating the turning point in deforestation?. Forest Policy and Economics, 148, 102905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102905
Paul, C., & Knoke, T. (2015). Between land sharing and land sparing - What role remains for forest management and conservation? International Forestry Review, 17(2), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815815500624
Permadi, G. S. (2015). Analisis permintaan impor kedelai Indonesia. Eko-Regional, 10(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.erjpe.2015.10.1.754
Phalan, B. T. (2018). What have we learned from the land sparing-sharing model?. Sustainability, 10(6), 1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061760
Power, A. G. (2010). Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: biological sciences, 365(1554), 2959-2971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
Prajanti, S. D. W., Pramono, S. E., & Adzmin, F. (2020). Factors influencing Indonesia coffee exports volume. Proceedings of the International Conference on Research and Academic Community Services (ICRACOS 2019), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.2991/icracos-19.2020.8
Purnomo, H., Okarda, B., Dermawan, A., Ilham, Q. P., Pacheco, P., Nurfatriani, F., & Suhendang, E. (2020). Reconciling oil palm economic development and environmental conservation in Indonesia: A value chain dynamic approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol. 2020.102089
Pyatt, D. G. (1993). Multi-purpose forests on peatland. Biodiversity & Conservation, 2, 548-555. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056748
Rahmani, T. A., Nurrochmat, D. R., Hero, Y., Park, M. S., Boer, R., & Satria, A. (2021). Evaluating the feasibility of oil palm agroforestry in Harapan Rainforest, Jambi, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 5(2), 458-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/ fs.v5i2.10375
Roslinda, E., Darusman, D., Suharjito, D., & Nurrochmat, D. R. (2012). Stakeholders analysis on the management of danau sentarum national park kapuas hulu regency, West Kalimantan. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 18(2), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.18.2.78
Rossita, A., Nurrochmat, D. R., Boer, R., Hein, L., & Riqqi, A. (2021). Assessing the monetary value of ecosystem services provided by Gaung–Batang Tuaka peat hydrological unit (Khg), Riau Province. Heliyon, 7(10), e08208. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08208
Rum, I. A., & Rijoly, J. C. D. (2019). Determine regional strategy in improving the competitiveness of agricultural commodities in global markets. Media Ekonomi, 27(2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.25105/me.v27i2.5796
Sahara, S., Pratinda, W. N. A. S., & Djaenudin, D. (2022). the Impacts of Investment in the Forestry Sector on the Indonesian Economy. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 9(2), 251-263. https://doi.org/10.20886/ijfr.2022.9.2.251-263
Sahide, M. A. K., Supratman, S., Maryudi, A., Kim, Y.-S., & Giessen, L. (2016). Decentralisation policy as recentralisation strategy: forest management units and community forestry in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 18(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816818206168
Schmitz, M. (2016). Strengthening the rule of law in Indonesia: the EU and the combat against illegal logging. Asia Europe Journal, 14(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10308-015-0436-8
Sharma, R., Nehren, U., Rahman, S. A., Meyer, M., Rimal, B., Seta, G. A., & Baral, H. (2018). Modeling land use and land cover changes and their effects on biodiversity in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Land, 7(2), 57. https:// doi.org/10.3390/land 7020057
Shen, J., Zhu, Q., Jiao, X., Ying, H., Wang, H., Wen, X., ... & Zhang, F. (2020). Agriculture green development: A model for China and the world. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 7(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019300
Simončič, T., & Bončina, A. (2015). Are forest functions a useful tool for multi-objective forest management planning? Experiences from Slovenia. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering: Journal for Theory and Application of Forestry Engineering, 36(2), 293-305.
Putri, S. Y., & Salam, S. (2019). The role of indonesian government in improving coffee competitiveness in the EU-Indonesia partnership and cooperation agreement framework. In Book Chapters of The 1st Jakarta International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (JICoSSH) (Vol. 3, pp. 311-322). https://doi.org/10.33822/jicossh.v3i0.23
Sugiharti, L., Purwono, R., & Padilla, M. A. E. (2019). Analysis of determinants of Indonesian agricultural exports. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 2676-2695. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(8)
Suryanto, Nurrochmat, D. R., Tarigan, S. D., Siregar, I. Z., Yassir, I., Tandio, T., & Abdulah, L. (2023). Defining the objectives and roles of Indonesian production forest governance through the multi-business forestry policy narrative. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1266(1). https:// doi.org/10.1088/ 1755-1315/1266/1/012030
Suryanto, & Sayektiningsih, T. (2020). Strengthening Indonesian production forest governance. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 487, 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/487/1/012006
Suryanto, S., Susilo, A., Onrizal, O., Andriansyah, M., & Muslim, T. (2018). Implementation of Multi-system Silviculture (Mss) to Improve Performance of Production Forest Management: a Case Study of PT. Sarpatim, Central Kalimantan. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 5(1), 1-19. https:// doi.org/10.20886/ijfr.2018.5.1.1-19
Suryanto, S., Susilo, A., Onrizal, O., Andriansyah, M., & Muslim, T. (2018). Implementation of Multi-system Silviculture (Mss) to Improve Performance of Production Forest Management: a Case Study of PT. Sarpatim, Central Kalimantan. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 5(1), 1-19.
Suryanto, & Wahyuni, T. (2016). Optimizing management for fragmented production forest area with multisystem silviculture; Simulation in ITCI forest, East Kalimantan. Proceeding International Conference of Indonesia Forestry Researchers III-2015: Forestry research to support sustainable timber production and self-sufficiency in food, energy, and water (pp. 553–563). Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
Susilastuti, D. (2017). Poverty reduction models: Indonesian agricultural economic approach. European Research Studies, 20(3A), 164. https://doi.org/10.35808/ ersj/702
Suwarno, A., van Noordwijk, M., Weikard, H. P., & Suyamto, D. (2018). Indonesia's forest conversion moratorium assessed with an agent-based model of Land-Use Change and Ecosystem Services (LUCES). Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9721-0
Szulecka, J., Obidzinski, K., & Dermawan, A. (2016). Corporate–society engagement in plantation forestry in Indonesia: Evolving approaches and their implications. Forest Policy and Economics, 62, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol. 2015.10.016
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.3390/ encyclopedia3010006
Tan, K. G., Merdikawati, N., & Rajan, R. S. (2016). Agricultural Productivity in Indonesian Provinces. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), 7(3), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijabim.2016070102
Tchappi, I. H., Galland, S., Kamla, V. C., Kamgang, J. C., Nono, C. M. S., & Zhao, H. (2019). Holonification model for a multilevel agent-based system: Application to road traffic. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 23(5–6). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00779-018-1181-y
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011). Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 108(50), 20260-20264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108
Tothmihaly, A., & Ingram, V. (2019). How can the productivity of Indonesian cocoa farms be increased?. Agribusiness, 35(3), 439-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/ agr.21595
Trentesaux, D. (2009). Distributed control of production systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 22(7), 971-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.engappai.2009.05.001
Tsujino, R., Yumoto, T., Kitamura, S., Djamaluddin, I., & Darnaedi, D. (2016). History of forest loss and degradation in Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 57, 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.034
UNPF. (2021). World Population Dashboard. United Nations Population Fund.
Vergarechea, M., Astrup, R., Fischer, C., Øistad, K., Blattert, C., Hartikainen, M., ... & Antón-Fernández, C. (2023). Future wood demands and ecosystem services trade-offs: A policy analysis in Norway. Forest Policy and Economics, 147, 102899. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.forpol.2022.102899
Wang, L., & Haghighi, A. (2016). Combined strength of holons, agents and function blocks in cyber-physical systems. Journal of manufacturing systems, 40, 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.05.002
Wang, L., Zheng, H., Wen, Z., Liu, L., Robinson, B. E., Li, R., ... & Kong, L. (2019). Ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs informing the supply-demand match of ecosystem services: Framework and application. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100939
Willmott, C. J., & Matsuura, K. (2005). Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30(1), 79-82. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr0 30079
Wu, C. H., Tang, Y. M., Tsang, Y. P., & Chau, K. Y. (2021). Immersive learning design for technology education: A soft systems methodology. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 745295. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.745295
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
