The Role of Ecosystem Services in Holistic Conservation within Protected Areas: A Case Study of the Song Thanh National Park, Vietnam
Additional Files
Vietnam has made a strong commitment to biodiversity conservation, as evidenced by its extensive network of protected areas. However, environmental issues persist in protected areas. Often, the resulting violence complicates the situation, making it more challenging to analyze and manage. We studied the perceptions of people in the buffer zone of the Song Thanh National Park, Quang Nam province, regarding the current status of ecosystem services (ES), the importance of ecosystem services, their changes over time, and people's participation in protecting ecosystem services. We employed a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative data. We conducted semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and household surveys. We found that local communities were aware of the current status of ecosystem services they used and the importance of prominent selected services, such as swidden agriculture and water resources, in their lives. The study also showed how people perceived the improvement of regulatory services since the establishment of the national park, while the extraction of forest ecosystem services led to legal violations. People's dependence on the provisioning services provided by protected areas often leads to environmental conflicts in their management. This study provides strong evidence that conservation is essential; however, an ES approach is needed to manage protected areas effectively to meet conservation objectives.
Alix-Garcia, J. M., Sims, K. R., & Yañez-Pagans, P. (2015). Only one tree from each seed? Environmental effectiveness and poverty alleviation in Mexico’s payments for ecosystem services program. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(4), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20130139
Bontempi, A., Venturi, P., Del Bene, D., Scheidel, A., Zaldo-Aubanell, Q., & Zaragoza, R. M. (2023). Conflict and conservation: On the role of protected areas for environmental justice. Global Environmental Change, 82, 102740. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102740
Castro, A. P., & Nielsen, E. (2003). Natural resource conflict management case studies: An analysis of power, participation and protected areas. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
Chen, Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, W., & Yu, Z. (2017). Analyzing farmers’ perceptions of ecosystem services and PES schemes within agricultural landscapes in Mengyin county, China: transforming trade-offs into synergies. Sustainability, 9(8), 1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081459
Cochard, R., Ngo, D. T., & Kull, C. A. (2020). Vietnam’s forest cover changes 2005–2016: Veering from transition to (yet more) transaction?. World Development, 135, 105051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105051
Dac Thanh. (2018). Quảng Nam lo thủy điện tích nước gây động đất [Quang Nam worries that hydroelectric dams will cause earthquakes]. VNEXPRESS. Retrieved 27 May 2025 from https://vnexpress.net/thoi-su/quang-nam-lo-thuy-dien-tich-nuoc-gay-dong-dat-3790687.html
Do Vinh and Le Huy. (2024). Khó khăn trong xử lý vấn nạn khai thác vàng trái phép ở Quảng Nam [Difficulties in handling illegal gold mining in Quang Nam]. VTV News online. Retrieved 27 May 2025 from https://vtv.vn/vtv8/kho-khan-trong-xu-ly-van-nan-khai-thac-vang-trai-phep-o-quang-nam-20240502120716185.htm.
Do Vinh. (2023). Quảng Nam tăng số tiền chi trả dịch vụ môi trường rừng để giảm phá rừng [Quang Nam increases payment for forest environmental services to reduce deforestation]. VTV News online. Retrieved 27 May 2025 from https://vtv.vn/vtv8 /quang-nam-tang-so-tien-chi-tra-dich-vu-moi-truong-rung-de-giam-pha-rung-20231023180655469.htm
Dorji, T., Brookes, J. D., Facelli, J. M., Sears, R. R., Norbu, T., Dorji, K., ... & Baral, H. (2019). Socio-cultural values of ecosystem services from Oak Forests in the Eastern Himalaya. Sustainability, 11(8), 2250. http://doi:10.3390/su11082250
Duong Thanh An & Pham Hanh Nguyen. (2021). Tiềm năng và cơ hội cho bảo tồn đa dạng sinh học ngoài khu bảo tồn ở Việt Nam [Potential and opportunities for biodiversity conservation outside protected areas in Viet Nam]. Environment Magazine. Retrieved from https://tapchimoitruong.vn/dien-dan--trao-doi-21/te m-nang-va-co-hoi-cho-bao-ton-da-dang-sinh-hoc-ngoai-khu-bao-ton-o-viet-nam-23254
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological economics, 68(3), 643-653. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441-473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
Gouwakinnou, G. N., Biaou, S., Vodouhe, F. G., Tovihessi, M. S., Awessou, B. K., & Biaou, H. S. (2019). Local perceptions and factors determining ecosystem services identification around two forest reserves in Northern Benin. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 15(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-01 9-0343-y
H Quan. (2022). Quảng Nam có 80 đơn vị sử dụng dịch vụ môi trường rừng [Quang Nam has 80 units using forest ecosystem services]. Quang Nam Newspaper. Retrieved 27 May 2025 from https://baoquangnam.vn/quang-nam-co-80-don-vi-su-dung-dich-vu-moi-truong-rung-3019217.html
Hoàng, V. C. (2012). Sustaining conservation of protected areas and local livelihoods in northern Vietnam through collaboration between protected area authorities and local people [Master’s thesis]. The Australian National University.
Hummel, C., Poursanidis, D., Orenstein, D., Elliott, M., Adamescu, M. C., Cazacu, C., ... & Hummel, H. (2019). Protected Area management: Fusion and confusion with the ecosystem services approach. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 2432-2443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.033
Huu Phuc. (2015). Cửa rừng vẫn mở [The forest gate is still open]. Quang Nam Newspaper. Retrieved 17 May 2025 from https://baoquangnam.vn/cua-rung-van-mo-3019888.html
IEBR. (2024). Sách đỏ Việt Nam [Viet Nam Red Book]. IEBR. Retrieved from https://iebr.ac.vn/vi/thu-vien/an-pham/sach-do-viet-nam-8.html
IUCN. (2008). Effective protected areas. IUCN. Retrieved from https://www.iucn.org/ our-work/topic/effective-protected-areas
Ivanić, K. Z., Stolton, S., Figureueroa Arango, C., & Dudley, N. (2020). Protected Areas Benefits Assessment Tool+(PA-BAT+): A tool to assess local stakeholder perceptions of the flow of benefits from protected areas. IUCN. Retrieved from https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/PATRS-004-En.pdf
Kisiwa, A., Langat, K., Gatama, S., Okoth, S., Kiprop, J., Cheboiwo, J., & Kagombe, J. (2020). Community perception of ecosystem services and management implications of three forests in Western part of Kenya. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal, 84(1), 80-90.
Lam Dong Newspaper. (2024). Cát Tiên: Xử lý 27 vụ vi phạm Luật Lâm nghiệp [Cat Tien: Handling 27 violations of the Forestry Law]. Lam Dong Newspaper. Retrieved May 27, 2025, from https://baolamdong.vn/phap-luat/202401/cat-tien-xu-ly-27-vu-vi-pham-luat-lam-nghiep-7712528/
Lan Anh. (2020). Chuyển khu bảo tồn thiên nhiên Sông Thanh thành Vườn quốc gia [Upgrade Song Thanh Nature Reserve to National Park]. Environment and Natural Resources Newspaper. Retrieved from https://baotainguyenmoitruong.vn/quan g-nam-chuyen-khu-bao-ton-thien-nhien-song-thanh-thanh-vuon-quoc-gia-3183 23.html
Lewis, C. (1996). Managing Conflicts in Protected Areas. IUCN. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/pa/tools/Managing%20conflicts%20in%20protected%20areas.pdf
McElwee, P. D. (2012). Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Viet Nam: Panacea or problem? Geoforum, 43(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.010
MEA Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2003). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press.
Ministry of Natural Resource and Environment (MONRE). (2023). National Report on Biodiversity 2022. MONRE.
Nam Giang and Phuoc Son District People's Committees. (2019). Statistical yearbook of Nam Giang and Phuoc Son districts 2019. Nam Giang & Phuoc Son District Statistics Offices.
Nguyen Ba Long. (2002). Kinh nghiệm giải quyết xung đột vùng đệm khu bảo tồn thiên nhiên ở một số quốc gia trên thế giới và Việt Nam [Experiences in Resolving Buffer Zone Conflicts in Nature Reserves: Cases from Selected Countries and Vietnam]. Vietnam National University of Forestry. Retrieved 17 May 2025 from https://qldd.vnuf.edu.vn/documents/1465312/2808986/B%C3%A0i%20b%C3%A1o%20Xung%20%C4%91%20E1%BB%99t%20v%C3%B9ng%20%C4%91%E1%BB%87m.pdf
Ouko, C. A., Mulwa, R., Kibugi, R., Owuor, M. A., Zaehringer, J. G., & Oguge, N. O. (2018). Community perceptions of ecosystem services and the management of Mt. Marsabit Forest in Northern Kenya. Environments, 5(11), 121. https://doi.org/10. 3390/environments5110121
Phan, T. T., & Nong, D. H. (2024). A Pilot Model of Community-based Forest Management in Xuan Nha Nature Reserve, Son La Province, Vietnam. Forest and Society, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v8i1.27487
Phung Thi Quynh Trang. (2022). Quảng Nam phát triển rừng bền vững nhằm giảm phát thải khí nhà kính và tăng cường trữ lượng các bon rừng [Quang Nam develops sustainable forests to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance forest carbon stocks]. Environment Magazine. Retrieved from https://tapchimoitruong.v n/giai-phap-cong-nghe-xanh-22/quang-nam-phat-trien-rung-ben-vung-nham-giam-phat-thai-khi-nha-kinh-va-tang-cuong-tru-luong-cac-bon-rung-26544
Plong Thai and Minh Phong. (2024). 6 tháng đầu năm, Phước Sơn xảy ra 12 vụ vi phạm lâm luật [12 cases of forestry laws violations in the first 6 months in 2024 in Phuoc Son district]. Quang Nam Newspaper. Retrieved 27 May 2025 from https://baoqua ngnam.vn/6-thang-dau-nam-phuoc-son-xay-ra-12-vu-vi-pham-lam-luat-3136934.html
Pu, X., Ding, W., Ye, W., Nan, X., & Lu, R. (2023). Ecosystem service research in protected areas: A systematic review of the literature on current practices and future prospects. Ecological Indicators, 154, 110817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolin d.2023.110817
Quoc Tuan. (2024). Vườn quốc gia và các khu bảo tồn rừng ở Quảng Nam nhiều vướng mắc cần tháo gỡ [National parks and forest protected areas in Quang Nam: Many problems to be resolved]. Quang Nam Newspaper. Retrieved 27 May 2025 from https://baoquangnam.vn/vuon-quoc-gia-va-cac-khu-bao-ton-rung-o-quang-nam-nhieu-vuong-mac-can-thao-go-3131599.html
Song Thanh National Park. (2021). Chuyển hạng Khu bảo tồn thiên nhiên Sông Thanh thành Vườn quốc gia Sông Thanh [Upgrading Song Thanh Nature Reserve to Song Thanh National Park]. Song Thanh National Park. Retrieved May 27, 2025, from http://gvqgsongthanh.gov.vn/chi-tiet-tin/group/119/nid/10046/chuyen-hang-khu-bao-ton-thien-nhien-song-thanh-thanh-vuon-quoc-gia-song-thanh
Song Thanh National Park. (2024). Giới thiệu Vườn quốc gia Sông Thanh [Introduction about Song Thanh National Park]. Song Thanh National Park. Retrieved 27 May 2025 from http://vuonquocgiasongthanh.qti.vn/gioi-thieu
Asah, S. T., Guerry, A. D., Blahna, D. J., & Lawler, J. J. (2014). Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: Human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications. Ecosystem services, 10, 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.e coser.2014.08.003
Tran Nguyen. (2023). Nâng cao năng lực giữ rừng từ dịch vụ môi trường rừng [Improving forest protection capacity from forest environmental services]. Quang Nam Newspaper. Retrieved June 1, 2025 from https://baoquangnam.vn/nang-cao-nang-luc-giu-rung-tu-dich-vu-moi-truong-rung-3019077.html
Turnbull, J. W., Johnston, E. L., & Clark, G. F. (2021). Evaluating the social and ecological effectiveness of partially protected marine areas. Conservation Biology, 35(3), 921-932. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13677
Wang, Y., Yang, H., Qi, D., Songer, M., Bai, W., Zhou, C., ... & Huang, Q. (2021). Efficacy and management challenges of the zoning designations of China's national parks. Biological Conservation, 254, 108962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon. 2021
Wangchuk, J., Choden, K., Sears, R. R., Baral, H., Yoezer, D., Tamang, K. T. D., ... & Dhendup, T. (2021). Community perception of ecosystem services from commercially managed forests in Bhutan. Ecosystem services, 50, 101335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101335
Iwanaga, S., Yokoyama, S., Duong, D. T., & Minh, N. V. (2019). Policy effects for forest conservation and local livelihood improvements in Vietnam: a case study on Bach Ma National Park. Journal of Forest Research, 24(5), 267-274. https://doi.org/10. 1080/13416979.2019.1655129
Copyright (c) 2025 Forest and Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
