Guidance and Counseling Evaluation Models during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Which is the most effective?

Authors

Ach. Sudrajad Nurismawan Universitas Negeri Surabaya https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3328-5201
Findivia Egga Fahruni Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Ela Nur Fadilah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Surya Adhi Nugraha Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i3.22357

Keywords:

COVID-19 pandemic, Evaluation Model, Guidance and Counseling

Abstract

This article aims to (1) map the evaluation models of guidance and counseling plans that counselors have implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) describe the fundamental concepts of evaluation models that are considered efficient and effective to be applied by counselors during the COVID-19 pandemic; (3) explain the practical procedures for an effective and efficient evaluation model to be applied by counselors during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article uses a literature study method to analyze the Miles & Huberman model on the latest relevant articles. It is hoped that the results will be by the article’s purpose. The results of the analysis of this article show that the guidance and counseling evaluation models used by counselors during the pandemic are four examples of the CIPP evaluation program, one evaluation model of the gap model, one evaluation model based on technology media, and six formative-summative evaluation models. Of the several evaluation models, there are two evaluation models that researchers recommend for counselors to use during the pandemic, namely the CIPP and gap evaluation models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azmi, Y., Sutisna, A., & Marjo, H. K. (2020). Evaluasi pelaksanaan layanan bimbingan klasikal terkait perilaku perundungan (bullying) pada siswa di SMA Negeri. TERAPUTIK: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 3(3), 120-125.

Badrujaman, A. (2019). Teori dan Aplikasi Evaluasi Program Bimbingan Konseling. PT Indeks.

Costa, A. Da. (2016). Evaluasi Program Bimbingan Kelompok di Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 6 Malang: Model Kesenjangan. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 2(1), 40–47. Diambil dari http://ejournal.stkipmpringsewu-lpg.ac.id/index.php/fokus/article/view/130

Dalmia, D., & Alam, F. A. (2021). Evaluasi Program Model Context dan Input. JUBIKOPS: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling dan Psikologi, 1, 111–124.

Damayanti, D. N., & Wiyono, B. D. (2021). Pelaksanaan Layanan Konsultasi di SMAN 1 Waru pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Model Evaluasi Kesenjangan). Jurnal BK UNESA, 12(2).

Dharmayana, I. W. (2020). Studi Evaluasi Pengelolaan Program Bimbingan dan Konseling di SMAN I Kota Bengkulu dan SMAN 11 Kota Bengkulu.” MANAJER PENDIDIKAN, 14 (2), 41-45.

Dwiyanti, N. M., & Wiyono, B. D. (2021). Evaluasi Model Cipp (Context, Input, Process, Product) Untuk Layanan Bimbingan Klasikal Secara Daring di Sma Negeri 1 Balongpanggang). Jurnal BK UNESA, 12 (2).

Efendi, M. (2021). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Bimbingan dan Konseling Di SMP Negeri 3 Pangkah Kabupaten Tegal Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Skripsi, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal.

Hidayah, G. R. (2021). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Layanan Konseling Individual Menggunakan Model Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) di SMP Negeri 6 Banjarmasin.” Jurnal Pelayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling, 4 (1).

Jalinus, N., Giatman, M., & Rizal, F. (2020). Evaluasi Program Penerapan Bimbingan Karir di SMK Negeri 5 Kota Padang. Cakrawala: Jurnal Pendidikan, 19-30.

Kemendikbud. (2014). Permendiknas No 111: Bimbingan dan Konseling pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah, Jakarta.

Listiyani, A. (2021). Layanan Bimbingan dan Konseling pada saat Pandemi COVID-19 di SMK Negeri 3 Pati. Empati-Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 8(1), 74-84.

Luneto, B., & Abas, A. K. H. (2020). Kinerja Konseling Dalam Budaya Pendidikan Karakter Kedisiplinan. Al-Minhaj: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 1–15.

Muyana, S. (2017). Context Input Process Product (CIPP): Model Evaluasi Layanan Informasi. In Prosiding Seminar Bimbingan dan Konseling.

POP BK SMA. (2016). Panduan Operasional Penyelenggaraan Bimbingan dan Konseling Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA), Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Prayitno, & Amti, E. (2009). Dasar-dasar Bimbingan Konseling. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Putra, E. M., & Nusantoro, E. (2015). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Bimbingan dan Konseling di SMK Negeri 1 Blora (Model CIPP). Indonesian Journal of Guidance and Counseling: Theory and Application, 4(1), 37–45.

Ramadhan, M. A. (2020). Evaluasi Program BK Dan Pelaksanaannya Di SMPN 5 Padang Panjang Yang Tidak Memiliki Jam Tetap BK.

Saputra, W. N. E. (2019). Evaluasi Model Discrepancy: Salah Satu Model Evaluasi Program Konseling. Insight: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 8(1), 28–33.

Winingsih, E. (2021). Potret Evaluasi Program Bimbingan dan Konseling di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 11(1), 43-55.

Yaswinda, Y., & Sakti, R. (2022). Model Evaluasi CIPP dalam Mengevaluasi Program Visit Home Selama Pandemi Covid 19 di TK Ar Rasyid Kecamatan Payakumbuh Selatan Kota Payakumbu. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(8), 2511-2522.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-14

How to Cite

Ach. Sudrajad Nurismawan, Findivia Egga Fahruni, Ela Nur Fadilah, & Surya Adhi Nugraha. (2022). Guidance and Counseling Evaluation Models during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Which is the most effective?. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(3), 400-404. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i3.22357