English Language Education Students’ Perceptions On The Use Of AI Technology As An Academic Tool At Tadulako University

Authors

  • Arfiyah Eka Putri Universitas Tadulako
  • Hasna Universitas Tadulako
  • Abraham Universitas Tadulako
  • Mochtar Marhum Universitas Tadulako

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v9i1.48995

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), students’ perception, English language education, academic integrity, digital literacy

Abstract

This research examines the perceptions of English Language Education students at Tadulako University regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as an academic support tool. The study employed a qualitative descriptive design. Data were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews involving active students in the 2024/2025 academic year. The findings indicate that most students have positive perceptions of AI in academic learning. Students perceive AI as useful for generating ideas, improving writing accuracy, supporting personalized learning, and providing real-time feedback. These features help students complete academic tasks more efficiently and increase their learning motivation. This finding suggests that AI can support students in overcoming common academic difficulties, particularly in writing and independent learning. The results are consistent with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which emphasizes perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use as key factors influencing technology acceptance. In this study, students accepted AI mainly because it is easy to use and provides immediate benefits in their academic activities. When students find a technology helpful and simple, they are more likely to integrate it into their learning process. However, the study also reveals several concerns. Some students expressed worries about over-dependence on AI, inaccurate information, and ethical issues such as plagiarism and loss of originality. These concerns indicate that while AI offers many advantages, its use also presents potential risks if not properly guided. Despite these challenges, most students demonstrated a good level of ethical awareness. They emphasized that AI should be used as a supporting tool rather than a replacement for their own thinking and academic effort. This shows that students understand the importance of maintaining academic integrity while using AI.

References

Abril et all. (2023). New Possibilities of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Language Learning (AIALL): Comparing Visions from the East and the West. Education Sciences, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121234

Al, R. et. (2025). Falou AI In Pronunciation Practice : Insights From Students ’ Experiences. 2(1), 11–24.

Amara et al. (2013). Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences. 1(5), 157–175.

Andini, C., Yassi, A.H., & Sukmawaty. (2021). The use of honorifics in English and Buginese with special reference to bone language: A comparative study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(7), 873-877.

Anggriyani, D., Pammu, A., Rahman, F., & Sahib, H. (2025, July). Sociocultural Dynamics and Their Impact on Speaking Proficiency Among Higher Education Students. In Proceedings of International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology (Vol. 11, pp. 87-95).

Antenos, E, at al. (2024). Journal of language teaching and research. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(5), 1391–1634. https://www.academypublication.com/issues3/jltr/vol15/jltr1505.pdf

Apriani et al. (2025). A Mixed-Method Study on the Effectiveness of Using ChatGPT in Academic Writing and Students ’ Perceived Experiences. 11(1).

Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Belda-medina, J. (2022). applied sciences Using Chatbots as AI Conversational Partners in Language Learning.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Budi et al. (2024). AI-powered EFL pedagogy: Integrating generative AI into university teaching preparation through UTAUT and activity theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(November). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100335

Davis 1989. (2021). Mobile Money : décryptage d ’ une succes story africaine Perceived Usefulness , Perceived Ease of Use , and User Acceptance of Information Technology. October. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fajt, B., & Schiller, E. (2025). ChatGPT in Academia : University Students ’ Attitudes Towards the use of ChatGPT and Plagiarism. 1363–1382.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational Research competencies for analysis and applications. New York, San fransisco: Gay, L.R.

Hartley et all. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Supporting Independent Student Learning: An Evaluative Case Study of ChatGPT and Learning to Code. Education Sciences, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020120

Huda, M., & Suwahyu, I. (2024). Peran_Artificial_Intelligence_Ai_Dalam_Pembelajara. REFERENSI ISLAMIKA: Jurnal Studi Islam , 2(2), 53–61.

Idowu, J. A. (2024). Debiasing Education Algorithms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(4), 1510–1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00389-4

Ifenthaler, D., Majumdar, R., Gorissen, P., Judge, M., Mishra, S., Raffaghelli, J., & Shimada, A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Implications for Policymakers, Researchers, and Practitioners. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(4), 1693–1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09747-0

Junaidi, J., Hamuddin, B., Julita, K., Rahman, F., & Derin, T. (2020). Artificial intelligence in EFL context: Rising students’ speaking performance with Lyra virtual assistance. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 6735–6741.

Ka, C., & Chan, Y. (2025). In understandings of academic misconduct. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8087–8108.

Karimah et al. (2024). Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelegence) dalam Pendidikan. 8(2), 193–204.

Korzynski at all. (2023). Artificial intelligence prompt engineering as a new digital competence: Analysis of generative AI technologies such as ChatGPT. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(3), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110302

Köylü, Y. (2025). Unlocking AI for language education: mastering prompts, critical evaluation of AI responses, and implications for language teaching and learning. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2025-0017

Malik at all. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5(October), 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296

Maola et al. (2024). Penerapan Artificial Intelligence Dalam Pendidikan Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Educatio, 19(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.29408/edc.v19i1.24772

Maphalala, M. C., & Ajani, O. A. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence as a learning tool in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 7(1), a01. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2025.vol7.1.01

Mehmood, T. (2021). Ethical AI in Education : Addressing Bias , Privacy , and Equity in AI-Driven Learning Systems. 38–45.

Pratiwi, N. I., Sosrohadi, S., Rahman, F., Dalyan, M., & Andini, C. (2026). The use of code-mixing by edu-influencers in social media: A communication strategy in sociolinguistic perspective. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 11(1), 1034-1042.

Rukiati et al. (n.d.). AI on Learning English : Application , Benefit , and Threat. 32–40.

Said, M. M., Rita, F., Weda, S., & Rahman, F. (2021). English language performance development through extracurricular activities at Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Tadulako University Palu. PalArch's Journal of Archaelogy of Egypt/Egyptology.

Selvam, R. (2025). Ethical and Privacy Considerations in AI-Driven Language Learning. LatIA, 3. https://doi.org/10.62486/latia2025328

Sujoko, A., Rahmiati, D., & Rahman, F. (2023). The role of radio as the public sphere for public political education in the digital era: Challenges and pitfalls. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2239627.

Suma, M., Rahman, F., Dalyan, M., Rahman, F. F., & Andini, C. (2023). Literature And Family Development: A Character Building Education. Journal of Namibian Studies, 39.

Syarifah, E. F., & Fakhruddin, A. (2024). Exploring Students’ Experience In Using Ai To Assist Their Writing. Journal of English Language Learning, 8(1), 558–564. https://doi.org/10.31949/jell.v8i1.10028

Tiwari, H. P. (2023). an Optimization-Based Artificial Intelligence Framework for Teaching English At the College Level. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(1), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.5954

Vaccino-Salvadore, S. (2023). Exploring the Ethical Dimensions of Using ChatGPT in Language Learning and Beyond. Languages, 8(3), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030191

Waluyo, B., & Kusumastuti, S. (2024). Generative AI in student English learning in Thai higher education: More engagement, better outcomes? Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 10(September), 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101146

Weda, S., Rahman, F., Atmowardoyo, H., Samad, I. A., Fitriani, S. S., Said, M. M., & Sakti, A. E. F. (2022). Intercultural communicative competence of students from different cultures in EFL classroom interaction in higher institution. International Journal of Research on English Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1-23.

Weda, S., Rahman, F., Samad, I. A., Gunawan, F., & Fitriani, S. S. (2022). How Millennials Can Promote Social Harmony through Intercultural Communication at Higher Education. Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 3(1), 231-243.

Yaumi, M. T. A. H., Rahman, F., & Sahib, H. (2023). Exploring WhatsApp as Teaching and Learning Activities during Covid-19/New Normal era: A Semiotic Technology Analysis. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(12), 7627-7634.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Eka Putri, A., Hasna, H., Abraham, A., & Marhum, M. (2026). English Language Education Students’ Perceptions On The Use Of AI Technology As An Academic Tool At Tadulako University. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 9(1), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v9i1.48995

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.