Machine Learning Meets Pedagogy: ChatGPT's Transformative Potential in Higher Education Learning Spaces

Authors

FX. Risang Baskara English Letters Department, Universitas Sanata Dharma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v7i1.32779

Keywords:

Active Learning, Argumentative Review, ChatGPT, Higher Education, Transformative Pedagogy

Abstract

In an era marked by rapid technological advancements intersecting with educational practices, the current inquiry focuses on the transformative potential of machine learning models, specifically ChatGPT, within higher education learning environments. Central to the discourse is the question: To what extent can ChatGPT function as a transformative tool in these educational spaces? While existing literature ventures into the capabilities of ChatGPT for simplistic tasks such as text generation, a comprehensive argumentative review that scrutinises its pedagogical applications remains conspicuously absent. This lacuna in academic scholarship necessitates the present study, which employs a multidisciplinary framework incorporating active learning theories, blended pedagogical models, and critical pedagogy. Through a meticulous dissection of empirical evidence, the investigation reveals ChatGPT's potential to enhance student engagement, enriching the curriculum and posing new ethical considerations. Significance emanates from the nuanced understanding and critical appraisal of ChatGPT's role, limitations, and ethical dilemmas in higher education, thereby contributing to a burgeoning field at the intersection of machine learning and pedagogy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, G., Mohammadi, A., Asadzandi, S., Shah, M., & Mojtahedzadeh, R. (2023). What Are the Indicators of Student Engagement in Learning Management Systems? A Systematized Review of the Literature. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(1), 117-136.

AlAfnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). Chatgpt as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60-68.

Almarghani, E. M., & Mijatovic, I. (2017). Factors affecting student engagement in HEIs-it is all about good teaching. Teaching in higher education, 22(8), 940-956.

Alshahrani, A. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on blended learning: Current trends and future research directions. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(4), 2029-2040.

Ayouni, S., Hajjej, F., Maddeh, M., & Al-Otaibi, S. (2021). A new ML-based approach to enhance student engagement in online environment. Plos one, 16(11), e0258788.

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62.

Bang, Y., Cahyawijaya, S., Lee, N., Dai, W., Su, D., Wilie, B., Lovenia, H., Ji, Z., Yu, T., Chung, W., Do, Q. V., Xu, Y., & Fung, P. (2023). A multitask, multilingual, multimodal evaluation of chatgpt on reasoning, hallucination, and interactivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04023.

Baskara, F. R. (2023a). Integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 44-55.

Baskara, F. R., Puri, A. D., & Wardhani, A. R. (2023). ChatGPT and the Pedagogical Challenge: Unveiling the Impact on Early-Career Academics in Higher Education. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 5(3), 311-322.

Baskara, R. (2023b). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343-358.

Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in higher education, 47, 1-32.

Carr, R., Palmer, S., & Hagel, P. (2015). Active learning: The importance of developing a comprehensive measure. Active learning in higher education, 16(3), 173-186.

Chan, K., Cheung, G., Brown, I., & Luk, G. (2015). Synthesizing technology adoption and learners' approaches towards active learning in higher education. In international conference on e-learning (p. 66). Academic Conferences International Limited.

Chavanayarn, S. (2023). Navigating Ethical Complexities Through Epistemological Analysis of ChatGPT. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 43(3-4), 105-114.

Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2021). Past, present, and future of smart learning: a topic-based bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 2.

Chinonso, O. E., Theresa, A. M.-E., & Aduke, T. C. (2023). ChatGPT for Teaching, Learning and Research: Prospects and Challenges. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.

Chiu, T. K. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S14-S30.

Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K.-A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(3), 02.

Crown, S., Fuentes, A., Jones, R., Nambiar, R., & Crown, D. (2010, June). Ann G. Neering: Interactive chatbot to motivate and engage engineering students. In 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 15-181).

Daniel, T., & Tivener, K. (2016). Effects of Sharing Clickers in an Active Learning Environment. J. Educ. Technol. Soc.

Dean, K. L., & Wright, S. (2016). Embedding engaged learning in high enrollment lecture-based classes. Higher Education, 74(4), 651-668.

Delialioğlu, Ö. (2012). Student Engagement in Blended Learning Environments with Lecture-Based and Problem-Based Instructional Approaches. J. Educ. Technol. Soc.

Elbanna, S., & Armstrong, L. (2024). Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in education: adapting for the future. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 3(1), 16-29.

Emenike, M. E., & Emenike, B. U. (2023). Was This Title Generated by ChatGPT? Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Text-Generation Software Programs for Chemists and Chemistry Educators. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(4), 1413-1418.

Eysenbach, G. (2023). The role of ChatGPT, generative language models, and artificial intelligence in medical education: a conversation with ChatGPT and a call for papers. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e46885.

Firat, M. (2023). How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education. Department of Distance Education, Open Education Faculty, Anadolu Unive.

Gilson, A., Safranek, C. W., Huang, T., Socrates, V., Chi, L., Taylor, R. A., & Chartash, D. (2023). How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e45312.

Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. https://digitallibrary.aau.ac.ae/handle/123456789/980

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil transactions on benchmarks, standards and evaluations, 2(4), 100089.

Harunasari, S. Y., & Halim, N. (2019). Digital Backchannel: Promoting Students' Engagement in EFL Large Class. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7).

Hasnia, H., Andini, C., Tahir, M. D., Hunaeni, H., Zulfikariandi, Z., & Muslimin, M. T. (2022). The Ability of 1st Class Students of SMAN 11 Enrekang to Arrange Verbal and Nominal Sentences. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(3), 539-550.

Hatmanto, E. D., & Sari, M. I. (2023). Aligning Theory and Practice: Leveraging Chat GPT for Effective English Language Teaching and Learning. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 440, p. 05001). EDP Sciences.

Holec, V., & Marynowski, R. (2020). Does it Matter Where You Teach? Insights from a Quasi-Experimental Study on Student Engagement in an Active Learning Classroom. https://opus.uleth.ca/handle/10133/5976

Holmes, K., & Prieto-Rodriguez, E. (2018). Student and staff perceptions of a learning management system for blended learning in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 43(3), 21-34.

Holmes, N. (2018). Engaging with assessment: Increasing student engagement through continuous assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(1), 23-34.

Huallpa, J. J. (2023). Exploring the ethical considerations of using Chat GPT in university education. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 11(4), 105-115.

Javed, Y., & Odhabi, H. (2018, November). Active learning in classrooms using online tools: evaluating Pear-Deck for students' engagement. In 2018 Fifth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT) (pp. 126-131). IEEE.

Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Mirriahi, N. (2017). Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 74-85.

Khalil, M., & Er, E. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection. ArXiv.

Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of e-learning, 15(2), pp107-115.

Khurma, O. A., Ali, N., & Hashem, R. (2023). Critical Reflections on ChatGPT in UAE Education: Navigating Equity and Governance for Safe and Effective Use. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(14).

Lancaster, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence, text generation tools and ChatGPT–does digital watermarking offer a solution?. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 10.

Lee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability, 11(4), 985.

Liu, Y., Chen, J., Zhang, M., & Rao, C. (2018). Student engagement study based on multi-cue detection and recognition in an intelligent learning environment. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(21), 28749-28775.

Luan, L., Lin, X., & Li, W. (2023). Exploring the cognitive dynamics of artificial intelligence in the post-COVID-19 and learning 3.0 era: A case study of ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04818.

Lumpkin, A., Achen, R. M., & Dodd, R. K. (2015). Student perceptions of active learning. College Student Journal, 49(1), 121-133.

Macfarlane, B. (2016). The performative turn in the assessment of student learning: A rights perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(7), 839-853.

Misseyanni, A., Papadopoulou, P., Marouli, C., & Lytras, M. D. (2018). Active learning stories in higher education: Lessons learned and good practices in STEM education. In Active learning strategies in higher education: Teaching for leadership, innovation, and creativity (pp. 75-105). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers, 12(8), 153.

Northey, G., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M., & Govind, R. (2015). Increasing student engagement using asynchronous learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 171-180.

Opara, E., Mfon-Ette Theresa, A., & Aduke, T. C. (2023). ChatGPT for teaching, learning and research: Prospects and challenges. Opara Emmanuel Chinonso, Adalikwu Mfon-Ette Theresa, Tolorunleke Caroline Aduke (2023). ChatGPT for Teaching, Learning and Research: Prospects and Challenges. Glob Acad J Humanit Soc Sci, 5.

Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of university teaching & learning practice, 20(2), 07.

Rahman, F., Abbas, A., Hasyim, M., Rahman, F., Abbas, A., & Hasyim, M. (2019). Facebook group as media of learning writing in ESP context: A case study at Hasanuddin University. Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 26(6.1), 153-167.

Rahman, F., & Widyastuti, W. (2023). Academic Self-Efficacy and Math Learning in Sidoarjo's High School Elementary Students. Academia Open, 8(1), 10-21070.

Rane, N. (2023). Enhancing the quality of teaching and learning through ChatGPT and similar large language models: challenges, future prospects, and ethical considerations in education. Future prospects, and ethical considerations in education (September 15, 2023).

Reid, L. F., Sexton, J., & Orsi, R. (2015). Outcomes of a faculty development program promoting scholarly teaching and student engagement at a large research-intensive university. The Journal of Faculty Development, 29(3), 23-36.

Rospigliosi, P. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in teaching and learning: what questions should we ask of ChatGPT?. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 1-3.

Su, Y., & Liu, Z. (2023). A Study of ChatGPT Empowering College Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in the Context of China. International Journal of New Developments in Education, 5(13), 1-7.

Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher education, 46, 153-184.

Wahab, R. A. (2020, December). The effect of group work on improving student's motivation to learn chemistry: An Action Research. In 2020 Sixth International Conference on e-Learning (econf) (pp. 121-125). IEEE.

Wang, A. (2021). Models of student engagement in music education classroom in higher education. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 738207.

Watson, T., & Berry, B. (2022). Using classroom clickers to increase academic engagement for elementary school–aged students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(2), 266-275.

Weda, S., Atmowardoyo, H., Rahman, F., Said, M. M., & Herman, H. (2022). Lecturers’Perception of Online Learning and its Associated Factors in the Midst of Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 112-131.

West, C. G. (2023). AI and the FCI: Can ChatGPT project an understanding of introductory physics?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01067.

Yaumi, M. T. A. H., Rahman, F., & Sahib, H. (2023). Exploring WhatsApp as Teaching and Learning Activities during Covid-19/New Normal era: A Semiotic Technology Analysis. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(12), 7627-7634.

Yaumi, M. T. A. H., Rahman, F., & Sahib, H. (2024). Bridging Language and Technology through Semiotic Technology. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 7(1), 52-61.

Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. Available at SSRN 4312418.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-15

How to Cite

Baskara, F. R. (2024). Machine Learning Meets Pedagogy: ChatGPT’s Transformative Potential in Higher Education Learning Spaces. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 7(1), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v7i1.32779