Speech Acts in the Social Context of the Film "Honeymoonish" by Elie El Semaan: A Pragmatic Review According to John Austin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i1.43372Keywords:
Speech Acts, Pragmatics, John Austin, FilmAbstract
This study aims to analyze speech acts in the social context of the film Honeymoonish by Elie El Semaan using the theoretical framework of pragmatics according to John Austin. Speech acts are categorized into three types: locution, illocution, and perlocution. Through a qualitative approach, this research identifies how dialogues in the film reflect social interactions among characters and the meanings contained within them. Data is obtained through the analysis of key scenes that highlight verbal and non-verbal communication. The results of the study show that speech acts in this film not only function as communication tools but also as a medium to express emotions, conflicts, and relevant social values. Additionally, the study highlights the role of context in shaping the interpretation of speech acts, as well as the ways in which power dynamics and social hierarchies influence character interactions. By examining the intricacies of language use in Honeymoonish, this research underscores the importance of pragmatics in understanding the subtleties of human communication. These findings are expected to contribute to the study of pragmatics and film analysis, as well as enrich the understanding of social dynamics in the context of contemporary cinema.
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press.
Anriadi, Rahman, F., & Pattu, A. (2022). The analysis on racism in 12 Years a Slave movie. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 10(1), 79-87.
Bachriani, B., Yassi, A. H., & Rahman, F. (2018). A Comparative Study of Euphemism in English and Buginese: Pragmatic Stylistics Contexts. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 1(4), 429-440.
Fauzia, R., Rahayu, S., & Sulistyo, H. (2019). Speech Act Analysis in Film Dialogue: A Pragmatic Perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 45-60.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.
Ko, Y., Kyeongjae, P., Jung, S., Sosrohadi, S., & Andini, C. (2025). Revisiting EPS TOPIK: Addressing Linguistic and Cultural Challenges for Migrant Workers in South Korea. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 8(2), 904-910.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nugraha, T. & Sulistyaningrum, D. (2018). Analyzing Speech Acts in Film Dialogue: A Pragmatic Approach. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 20(1), 101-115.
Sari, D. R., & Prabowo, H. (2020). The Role of Social and Cultural Context in Communication Analysis. Journal of Social Interaction, 25(3), 87-98.
Rahman, F., & Weda, S. (2019). Linguistic deviation and the rhetoric figures in Shakespeare’s selected plays. XLinguage" European Scientific Language Journal", 12(1), 37-52.
Sukmawaty, S., Andini, C., & Fathu Rahman, F. (2022). The Shift of Honorifics due to The Promotion As A Government Official: Comparative Study. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i1.20817
Yaumi, M. T. A. H., Rahman, F., & Sahib, H. (2023). Exploring WhatsApp as Teaching and Learning Activities during Covid-19/New Normal era: A Semiotic Technology Analysis. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(12), 7627-7634.
Youngsun, K., Sosrohadi, S., Andini, C., Adinda, R., Jae, P. K., Yookyung, K., & Jung, S. (2024). Beyond the Korean Wave: Understanding the Motivation of Among Indonesian Gen Z to Learn Korean in the K-Pop Trend. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(06).
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Noviana Yusanti, Rohanda Rohanda, Muhammad Nurhasan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.