Symbolism of Victorian Society in the Anthropomorphism of the Peter Rabbit Picture Book (1901)

Authors

  • Syahruni Junaid Alauddin Islamic State University of Makassar
  • Citra Andini Hasanuddin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i1.43605

Keywords:

Anthropomorpism, Symbol, Peter Rabbit, Picture Book, Victorian Society

Abstract

This paper explores the anthropomorphic elements in Beatrix Potter's Peter Rabbit and their role in reflecting Victorian societal values. Through the depiction of Peter wearing human-like attire, notably his blue jacket, and standing upright, Potter imbues the character with human qualities, making him relatable to young readers. This anthropomorphism serves to symbolize both the innocence and adventurous spirit of childhood, while highlighting the tension between curiosity and the moral lessons of obedience and responsibility. The garden, as a space of both adventure and danger, mirrors the Victorian ideal of childhood exploration within the confines of authority. Peter's journey—marked by disobedience, mischief, and eventual growth—illustrates the duality of childhood: innocence coupled with the need for guidance. By balancing exploration with consequences, Potter’s narrative conveys timeless moral lessons, making Peter Rabbit a relatable, enduring story for both children and adults that transcends its Victorian context. The story’s appeal lies in its ability to speak to universal themes of personal growth and the balance between freedom and discipline. Potter’s use of anthropomorphism, coupled with her nuanced portrayal of childhood, ensures that Peter Rabbit remains an essential piece of literature that continues to resonate across generations.

References

Abrams, M. H. (1999). The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition. Oxford University Press.

Andini, C. (2017). Children Emotion in The Movie" Big Hero 6 (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar).

Bal, M. (1997). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. University of Toronto Press.

Barthes, R. (1967). Elements of semiology. Hill and Wang.

Blythe, S. G. (2007). The importance of play and childhood in the Victorian period. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Grenby, M. O. (2014). Children’s literature. Edinburgh University Press.

Goddard Blythe, S. (2007). The role of childhood and education in Victorian literature. Routledge.

Hunt, P. (1991). Criticism, theory, and children's literature. Blackwell.

Johnson, G. A. (2012). The semiotics of children's literature: Visual culture and moral codes. Oxford University Press.

Jumriati, Rahman, F., & Lewa, I. (2021, November). The Potential of Children’s Literature in Educatioan and Environmental Ethics: Linguistic and Literary Approaches. In The 1st International Conference on Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (ICoRSH 2020) (pp. 1054-1058). Atlantis Press.

Junaid, S., Andini, C., Atsyania, N. A., & Rahmawati, A. N. (2024). Exploring Rani Mehra’S Culture Shock In Queen (2014) Movie Through the Lens of Sverre Lysgaard’S U-Curve Theory. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 7(3), 475-489.

Lanta, J., Rahman, F., Lewa, I., & Akhmar, A. M. (2022). Respect for Nature in Indonesian Children’s Fiction: Ecocriticism Perspective. Webology, 19(1), 6010-6021.

Lobel, A. (1970). Frog and Toad are friends. Harper & Row.

Mahdori, F., Rahman, F., Faisal, R., Aditya Mochammad, T. P., Sosrohadi, S., & Sachiya, F. (2025). Revealing aspect of culture through literature: Learning from Sutan Takdir Alisjahbana. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(3), 1211-1216. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar677

Muchtar, J., Sahib, H., & Rahman, F. (2023). The refusal catcalling strategy by women in makassar: Semiotics analysis. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(5), 2941-2951.

Nikolajeva, M. (2010). Power, voice and subjectivity in literature for young readers. Routledge.

Nodelman, P. (1988). Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picture books. University of Georgia Press.

Nussbaum, M. (2001). The education of the emotions: A feminist perspective. Journal of Educational Philosophy, 17(1), 15-27.

Pullman, P. (2000). Fairy tales and their transformation. Oxford University Press.

Rose, J. (1984). The case of Peter Rabbit: Changing representations of childhood. In The politics of children's literature (pp. 55-67). University Press.

Sipe, L. R. (2008). Storytime: Young children's literary understanding in the classroom. Teachers College Press.

Sulastri, T., & Hakim, L. (2024). Solipsism: Understanding Japanese Culture Through the Novel "Namaku Hiroko" by N.H. DINI (A Critical Students Discussion Perspective). ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 7(1), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v7i1.34418

White, E. B. (1945). Charlotte's Web. HarperCollins.

Yaumi, M. T. A. H., Rahman, F., & Sahib, H. (2024). Bridging Language and Technology through Semiotic Technology. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 7(1), 52-61.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-28

How to Cite

Junaid, S., & Andini, C. (2025). Symbolism of Victorian Society in the Anthropomorphism of the Peter Rabbit Picture Book (1901). ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(1), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i1.43605

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.