Understanding the Safeguarding Role of Forest Resources and Its Determinants During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia
Additional Files
Sustainable forest management can play a vital role in building resilient economies and communities that can withstand pandemics, climate change, and other global challenges. Through a comprehensive analysis of local communities surrounding protected areas, we examine the extent of forest reliance for livelihoods and identify key drivers behind changes in forest-resource use during the pre-pandemic in 2019 and post-pandemic in 2022. The study's findings reveal a noteworthy increase in the proportion of land utilized for livelihood activities, especially for production forests, in study sites between 2019 and 2022. Local communities still heavily rely on forest resources for their livelihoods, with a significant increase in household income derived from forest-based activities between 2019 and 2022, approximately 112.1%, 28.7%, and 1.68% for Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos, respectively. Additionally, the study highlights an upsurge in forest dependence during the pandemic period, emphasizing the importance of forests in safeguarding the economies of forest-dependent communities. Findings also shed light on the determinants of forest dependence changes amid the pandemic, including income from forests, poverty status, minority group status, and receipt of COVID-19 relief. These results provide valuable insights into the relationship between forest resources and rural livelihoods for promoting sustainable forest management and safeguarding the well-being of local communities in the face of future challenges.
Ali, A., Ashraf, M. I., Gulzar, S., & Akmal, M. (2020). Estimation of forest carbon stocks in temperate and subtropical mountain systems of Pakistan: implications for REDD+ and climate change mitigation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8157-x
Amador-Jiménez, M., Millner, N., Palmer, C., Pennington, R. T., & Sileci, L., (2020). The Unintended Impact of Colombia’s Covid-19 Lockdown on Forest Fires. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76(4), 1081-1105. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10640-020-00501-5
Angelsen, A., Jagger, P., Babigumira, R., Belcher, B., Hogarth, N. J., Bauch, S., ... & Wunder, S. (2014). Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Development, 64(1), S12-S28. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006
ASEAN Briefing. (2022). COVID-19 Cases in ASEAN – Regular Updates by Country. ASEAN Briefing. Accessed on May 3, 2022 at https://www.aseanbriefing.com/ news/covid-19-cases-in-asean-regular-updates-by-country/
Bista, R., Parajuli, R., Giri, K., Karki, R., & Song, C. (2022). Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the livelihoods of rural households in the community forestry landscape in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Trees, Forests and People, 9, 100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100312
Chambers, R. (1994). The Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) Workbook. Intermediate Technology Development Group.
De Queiroz, J.S., Griswold, D., Nguyen, D.T. and Hall, P. (2013). Vietnam Tropical Forest and Biodiversity Assessment. USAID.
Estoque, R. C., Ooba, M., Avitabile, V., Hijioka, Y., DasGupta, R., Togawa, T., & Murayama, Y. (2019). The future of Southeast Asia’s forests. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1829.. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09646-4
FAO. (2008). Links between national forest programmes and poverty reduction strategies. FAO. Accessed on April 25, 2022 at https://www.fao.org/3/k3730e/ k3730e00.htm
FAO. (2020). In Brief to The State of Food and Agriculture 2020. FAO. Accessed on April 1 2022 at https://www.fao.org/agrifood-economics/publications/detail/ en/c/1333422/
Frey, G. E., Kallayanamitra, C., Wilkens, P., & James, N. A. (2022). Defining and Measuring Forest Dependence in the United States: Operationalization and Sensitivity Analysis. Forests, 13(4), 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13040577
Garekae, H., Thakadu, O. T., & Lepetu, J. (2017). Socio-economic factors influencing household forest dependency in Chobe enclave, Botswana. Ecological Processes, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-017-0107-3
Golar, G., Malik, A., Muis, H., Herman, A., Nurudin, N., & Lukman, L. (2020). The social-economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic: implications for potential forest degradation. Heliyon, 6(10), e05354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020. e05354
Harvey, A. C., (1976). Estimating Regression Models with Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 44(3), 461–465. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 1913974
Hussain, J., Zhou, K., Akbar, M., Raza, G., Ali, S., Hussain, A., ... & Ghulam, A. (2019). Dependence of rural livelihoods on forest resources in Naltar Valley, a dry temperate mountainous region, Pakistan. Global Ecology and Conservation, 20, e00765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00765
Iswanto, S., Nurasiah, N., Kusnafizal, T., Haikal, M., Zulfan, Z., Azis, A., & Ramazan, R. (2022). Management, Exploitation and Contract Labor of the Pine Merkusi Forest in Tanah Gayo during the Dutch Colonial Period. Forest and Society, 6(2), 699-722. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v6i2.20138
Kamanga, P., Vedeld, P., & Sjaastad, E. (2009). Forest incomes and rural livelihoods in Chiradzulu District, Malawi. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 613-624. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.018
Kien, N. D., Dung, T. Q., Oanh, D. T. K., An, L. T., Dinh, N. C., Phan, N. T., & Nga, L. T. T. (2023). Climate‐resilient practices and welfare impacts on rice‐cultivating households in Vietnam: Does joint adoption of multiple practices matter?. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 67(2), 263-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12506
Laudari, H. K., Pariyar, S., & Maraseni, T. (2021). COVID-19 lockdown and the forestry sector: Insight from Gandaki province of Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics, 131, 102556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102556
Lindsey, P., Allan, J., Brehony, P., Dickman, A., Robson, A., Begg, C., ... & Tyrrell, P. (2020). Conserving Africa’s wildlife and wildlands through the COVID-19 crisis and beyond. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(10), 1300-1310. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41559-020-1275-6
Lobry de Bruyn, L., Duong, T. M. P., Kristiansen, P., Marshall, G. R., & Wilkes, J. (2022). The Role of Livelihood Initiatives in Reducing Non-wood Forest Product Reliance in Protected Areas of Southern Vietnam: Opportunities and Challenges. In Rashid, A. Z. M. M., Khan, N. A., & Hossain, M. (Eds), Non-Wood Forest Products of Asia: Knowledge, Conservation and Livelihood (pp. 221-251). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99313-9_10
Mamo, G., Sjaastad, E., & Vedeld, P. (2007). Economic dependence on forest resources: A case from Dendi District, Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(8), 916-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2006.08.001
Maraseni, T., Poudyal, B. H., Aryal, K., & Laudari, H. K. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 in the forestry sector: A case of lowland region of Nepal. Land Use Policy, 120, 106280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106280
My, N. H., Kien, N. D., Hung, P. X., & Quynh Anh, L. T. (2023). Does the value of water-related ecosystem services capture water scarcity? Application to rice farming in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam?. Water Economics and Policy, 2350006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X23500066
Nerfa, L., Rhemtulla, J. M. & Zerriffi, H. (2020). Forest dependence is more than forest income: Development of a new index of forest product collection and livelihood resources. World Development, 125, 104689. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104689
Neumann, R. P. & Hirsh, E. (2000). Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products: Review and Analysis of Research. CIFOR.
Nguyen, T. V., & Tran, T. Q. (2018). Forestland and rural household livelihoods in the North Central Provinces, Vietnam. Land Use Policy, 79, 10-19. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.046
Njana, M. A., Mbilinyi, B., & Eliakimu, Z. (2021). The role of forests in the mitigation of global climate change: Emprical evidence from Tanzania. Environmental Challenges, 4, 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100170
Ntiyakunze, M. S., & Stage, J. (2022). Forest dependence in Tanzania: Analysis of the determinants of perceived forest dependence. Trees, Forests and People, 8, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100277
Nunan, F., Barnes, C., & Krishnamurthy, S. (2022). The Routledge Handbook on Livelihoods in the Global South. Routledge.
Panpakdee, C., & Palinthorn, F. (2021). Does the COVID-19 pandemic affect social-ecological resilience of organic rice production system in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand?. Forest and Society, 5(2), 209-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs. v5i2.10642
Phan, N. T., Lee, J., & Kien, N. D. (2022a). The Impact of Land Fragmentation in Rice Production on Household Food Insecurity in Vietnam. Sustainability, 14(18), 11162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811162
Phan, N. T., Pabuayon, I. M., Kien, N. D., Dung, T. Q., An, L. T., & Dinh, N. C. (2022b). Factors driving the adoption of coping strategies to market risks of shrimp farmers: A case study in a coastal province of Vietnam. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 12(2), 65-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.55493/ 5005.v12i2.4444
Poffenberger, M. (2006). People in the forest: community forestry experiences from Southeast Asia. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2006.008683
RECOFTC. (2021). Tenure and Social Forestry in ASEAN Member States: Status, Analysis and Recommendations. RECOFTC.
Sapkota, L. M., Silori, C. S., Dangal, S. P., Than, M. M., Sokchea, T., Chhneang, K., ... & Katwal, N. (2022). Beyond the Biophysical: Contribution of Community Forestry in Building Social-Ecological Resilience. In Kumar, M., Dhyani, S., & Kalra, N. (Eds.), Forest Dynamics and Conservation (pp. 187–211). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0071-6_9
Sattler, C., Rommel, J., Chen, C., García-Llorente, M., Gutiérrez-Briceño, I., Prager, K., ... & Kelemen, E. (2022). Participatory research in times of COVID-19 and beyond: Adjusting your methodological toolkits. One Earth, 5(1), 62-73.
Singh, R. K., Bhardwaj, R., Sureja, A. K., Kumar, A., Singh, A., Hazarika, B. N., ... & Rallen, O. (2022). Livelihood resilience in the face of multiple stressors: biocultural resource-based adaptive strategies among the vulnerable communities. Sustainability Science, 17, 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01057-z
Smita, J., & Reddy, S. R., (2010). Participatory rural appraisal: Concepts and methods. Sage Publications.
Soe, K. T., & Yeo-Chang, Y. (2019). Livelihood dependency on non-timber forest products: Implications for REDD+. Forests, 10(5), 427. https://doi.org/10. 3390/f10050427
Tan, N. Q., Dinh, N. C., Linh, N. H. K., Hung, P. X., Kien, N. D., Phuong, T. T., & Tinh, B. D. (2023). Climate change vulnerability and poverty nexus: Evidence from coastal communities in central Vietnam. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID), 117(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.36253/ jaeid-13966
Troëng, S., Barbier, E. & Rodríguez, C.M. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic is not a break for nature-let’s make sure there is one after the crisis. Weforum. Accessed on May 10, 2022 at https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/05/covid-19-coronavirus-pandemic-nature-environment-green-stimulus-biodiversity/
Van-Mai, T. K., & KIM, D. C. (2020). The effects of Vietnam’s tourism development and payments for forest environmental services policies on local livelihoods in Phong Nha-Kẻ Bàng national park areas. Geographical review of Japan series B, 93(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4157/geogrevjapanb.93.1
Waruingi, E., Mbeche, R., & Ateka, J. (2021). Determinants of forest dependent household’s participation in payment for ecosystem services: Evidence from Plantation Establishment Livelihood Improvement Scheme (PELIS) in Kenya. Global Ecology and Conservation, 26, e01514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gecco.2021.e01514
Copyright (c) 2024 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
