From SEZs to Thailand 4.0: Geopolitics of borderlands in the Thai state’s vision
Versions
- 2018-04-26 (2)
- 2018-04-26 (1)
Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /home/journal33/public_html/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.inc.php on line 49
This article uses the case of Thailand’s two economic policies –the border Special Economic Zones and the Thailand 4.0 model, to explore geopolitics of the Thai-Burmese borderland. It also discuss a theoretical gap in accounting the ways in which the state engages with transnational flows of capital and peoples, and proposes to use the concept of ‘border partial citizenship’ to bridge this gap. It argues that the shift in Thailand’s economic policy portrayed the different ways in which the Thai state envisaged its geographical territory in relations to capital and human mobility. In the border SEZ project, the Thai borderland is a site where the state loosened its relationship with its non-subjects. However, while the border regions seem increasingly opening for migrant mobility, the inner core of the Thai geo-body, a geographical territory that embodies nationhood, is proportionately hyper-sanitized by patriotic discourses of the national advancement in knowledge-based economy and the harsh policy toward undocumented migrant population
Board of Investment (Thailand). (2015). Guide to Investment in the Special Economic Development Zones.
Hall, A. (2016, April 8th). MoU system still exploits workers. Bangkok Post. Retrieved from https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/925649/mou-system-still-exploits-workers
IBON Books. (2005). Export Processing Zones: A Path Towards Industrialization? (IBON Issue Primer Series). the Philippines.
International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2017). IOM Thailand National Strategy 2017-2020.
Jones, R. (2012). Border Walls: Security and the War on Terror in the United States, India, and Israel (1st ed.). London & New York: Zed Books.
Jones, R. (2016). Violent Borders: Refugees and the Right to Move. London & New York: Verso.
Joseph, Y., & Rothfuss, R. (2014). Symbolic Bordering and the Securitization of Identity Markers in Nigeria’s Ethno-Religious Segregated City of Jos. In Placing the Border in Everyday Life. London&New York: Routledge.
Kudo, T., & Ishida, M. (2013). Prologue: Progress in Cross-Border Movement and the Development of Border Economic Zones. In Border Economies in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. Palgrave Macmillan.
McNEVIN, A. (2007). Irregular migrants, neoliberal geographies and spatial frontiers of “the political.” Review of International Studies, 33(4), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007711
Nair, S. (2009). Sovereignty, security, and migrants: Making bare life. In International Relations and States of Exception: Margins, peripheries, and excluded bodies (pp. 95–115). London&New York: Routledge.
Nyiri, Pal (2012) “Enclaves of Improvement: Sovereignty and Developmentalism in the Special Zones of the China-Lao Borderlands.” Comparative Studies in Society and History. 54(3) 533-562.
Ong, A. (2000). Graduated Sovereignty in South-East Asia. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(4), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051310
Paitoonpong, S., & Chalamwong, Y. (2012). Managing International Labor Migration in ASEAN: A Case Study of Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Thailand Development Research Institute.
Papadopoulos, N., & Malhotra, S. (2007). Export Processing Zones in Development and International Marketing: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Macromarketing, 27(2), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146707300070
Pearson, R., & Kusakabe, K. (2012). Thailand’s Hidden Workforce: Burmese Migrant Women Factory Workers. London&New York: Zed Books.
Popescu, G. (2011). Bordering and Ordering the Twenty-first Century: Understanding Borders. Rowman & Littlefield.
National Broadcasting Services of Thailand. (2017). “Seasonal Alien Worker.” Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r49ApRFp3xg
Pongsawat, P. (2007). Border Partial Citizenship, Border Towns, and Thai-Myanmar Cross-Border Development: Case Studies at the Thai Border Towns (Dissertation). University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.
Public Relation Department. (2016, October 31). Transition toward Thailand 4.0 through the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy. Inside Thailand. Retrieved from http://thailand.prd.go.th/thailand/ewt_news.php?nid=4083&filename=index
Rajaram, P. K., & Grundy-Warr, C. (2004). The Irregular Migrant as Homo Sacer: Migration and Detention in Australia, Malaysia, and Thailand. International Migration, 42(1), 33–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-7985.2004.00273.x
Royal Thai Embassy, (2017a) “Thailand 4.0.” [website]. Retrieved from: http://thaiembdc.org/thailand-4-0-2/ Washington DC.
Royal Thai Embassy, (2017b) “Development of Technology Cluster and Future Industries.” [website]. Retrieved from: http://thaiembdc.org/agenda-2-development-of-technology-cluster-and-future-industries/ Washington DC.
Royal Thai Embassy, (2017c) “Integrating with ASEAN and Connecting Thailand to the Global Community.” [website]. Retrieved from: http://thaiembdc.org/agenda-5-integrating-with-asean-and-connecting-thailand-to-the-global-community/ Washington DC.
Scott, J. C. (1999). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press.
Sassen, S. (1990). The Mobility of Labor and Capital: A Study in International Investment and Labor Flow (Paperback). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tang, L. L. (2005). Statelessness, human rights and gender : irregular migrant workers from Burma in Thailand. Brill Academic.i
Thame, C. (2017). SEZs and Value Extraction from the Mekong: A Case Study on the Control and Exploitation of Land and Labour in Cambodia and Myanmar’s Special Economic Zones. Bangkok, Thailand: Focus on the Global South.
Winichakul, T. (1994). Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
เครือข่ายส่งเสริมสิทธิแรงงานข้ามชาติที่แม่สอดเรียกร้องการจ้างงานเป็นธรรม [Network of Mae Sot-based Migrant Rights Advocate Calls for Just Employment]. (2017, December 17). Prachatai. Retrieved from https://prachatai.com/journal/2017/12/74628
รมว.แรงงานสั่งเร่งพิสูจน์สัญชาติแรงงานต่างด้าว พบยังไม่ขึ้นทะเบียนอีก 8 แสนคน [Minister of Labor Urges the National Verification Process. 8 Hundred Thousand Found Unregistered]. (2018, January 12). ThaiPBS. Retrieved from https://news.thaipbs.or.th/content/269297
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
