Assessing the Potential of Thailand's National Forest Reserves for Tourism Development and Sustainable Recreational Use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v9i2.36428Keywords:
National Forest Reserves, Recreational Potential Assessment, Tourism Development, Recreational Use, ThailandAbstract
This research aimed to evaluate the potential of Thailand's national forest reserves for promoting sustainable recreational activities. Research tools included a comprehensive tourism potential assessment form for evaluating tourism development. Additionally, semi-structured interviews and focus group meetings with key informants were conducted to gain insights into local perspectives, challenges, and opportunities related to tourism. Site surveys were conducted during January - August 2021. The study initially conducted an assessment of 122 destinations located within 85 national forest reserves across the country to determine their tourism development potential. Subsequently, 16 national forest reserves exhibiting high potential were selected for on-site surveys. These revealed a diverse range of recreational resources within the national forest reserves, including waterfalls, rapids, rivers, viewpoints, ecotourism sites, nature trails, hot springs, caves, geographic landscapes, and archaeological sites. The assessment of tourism development potential identified six areas with high potential, eight areas with medium potential, and two areas with low potential within the national forest reserves. To effectively promote recreation and sustainable tourism in Thailand's national forest reserves, the Royal Forest Department, responsible for overseeing these areas, should prioritize the following key considerations: 1) development of interpretive programs that align with the unique features and highlights of each area to enhance visitors' learning experiences, 2) active involvement of local communities in tourism development initiatives, and 3) provision of basic service facilities to support visitor activities. This is a normative assessment, and future studies should focus on the ways that tourism is reshaping these landscapes and livelihoods.
References
Baloch, Q. B., Shah, S. N., Iqbal, N., Sheeraz, M., Asadullah, M., Mahar, S., & Khan, A. U. (2023). Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: A suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(3), 5917-5930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22496-w
Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Sutherland, L. A. (2011). Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tourism management, 32(4), 770-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.012
Berkes, F. (2017). Environmental governance for the anthropocene? Social-ecological systems, resilience, and collaborative learning. Sustainability, 9(7), 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071232
Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.
Bhusal, N. P. (2012). Buffer zone management system in protected areas of Nepal. The Third Pole: Journal of Geography Education, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.3126/ttp.v 11i0.11558
Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. Journal of sustainable tourism, 19(4-5), 411-421. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09669582.2011.580586
Brandt, J. S., & Buckley, R. C. (2018). A global systematic review of empirical evidence of ecotourism impacts on forests in biodiversity hotspots. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 32, 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust. 2018.04.004
Brunt, P., Semley, N., & Horner, S. (2017). Research methods in tourism, hospitality and events management. Sage Publications, Inc.
Bushell, R., & Bricker, K. (2017). Tourism in protected areas: Developing meaningful standards. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 17(1), 106-120. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1467358416636173
Butler, R. W. (1980). The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographies, 24(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/1 0.1111/j.1541-0064.1980.tb00970.x
Chankhao, A., Kraichak, E., Phumsathan, S., & Pongpattananurak, N. (2022). Dynamics of forage and management implications for large herbivore habitat in seasonally dry forest of Southeast Asia. Forests, 13(9), 1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/f1 3091463
Department of Tourism. (2013). Guidelines for Natural Tourist Attractions Quality Standard Assessment. Ministry of Tourism and Sports, Bangkok, Thailand. Department of Tourism. Retrieved from https://dl.parliament.go.th/handle/lirt/5 69289
Friedman, R. S., Guerreroa, A. M., McAllister, R. R. J., Rhodes, J. R., Santika, T., Budiharta, S., Indrawan, T., Hutabarat, J. A., Kusworo, A., Yogaswara, H., Meijaard, E., St. John, F. A. V., Struebig, M. J., & Wilson, K. A. (2020). Beyond the community in participatory forest management: A governance network perspective. Land Use Policy, 97, 104738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104738
Forest Land Management Office. (2023). National Reserved Forest Area. (Annual Report). Office of the Planning Division, Forest Land Management Office, Royal Forest Department, Bangkok, Thailand.
Gamidullaeva, L., Vasin, S., Tolstykh, T., & Zinchenko, S. (2022). Approach to regional tourism potential assessment in view of cross-sectoral ecosystem development. Sustainability, 14(22), 15476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14221 5476
Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC). (2019). GSTC Destination Criteria with Performance Indicators and SDGs. Global Sustainable Tourism Council.
Haukeland, J. V., Fredman, P., Tyrväinen, L., Siegrist, D., & Lindberg, K. (2023). Prospects for nature-based tourism: identifying trends with commercial potential. Journal of Ecotourism, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.20 23.2178444
Kuitpo Forest. (2022). ForestrySA: Annual Report 2021-2022. Forestry SA.
Lamichhane, B. R., Persoon, G. A., Leirs, H., Poudel, S., Subedi, N., Pokheral, C. P., ... & De Iongh, H. H. (2019). Contribution of buffer zone programs to reduce human-wildlife impacts: the case of the Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Human Ecology, 47(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-0054-y
Lindberg, M. (1991). An interactive approach to assessing the suggestibility and testimony of eyewitnesses. In The Suggestibility of Children's Recollections, Jun, 1989, Cornell U, Ithaca, NY, US; This volume is based in part on the aforementioned conference (pp. 47–55). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10097-004
Mihardja, E. J., Alisjahbana, S., Agustini, P. M., Sari, D. A. P., & Pardede, T. S. (2023). Forest wellness tourism destination branding for supporting disaster mitigation: A case of Batur UNESCO Global Geopark, Bali. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(1), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.0 1.003
Musin, H. G., Denisov, S. V., Khalilov, I. I., & Minnichanov, A. R. (2020). Differentiated assessment of the recreational potential of forests in the management of recreational forests. BIO Web of Conferences, 17, 00222. https://doi.org/10.105 1/bioconf/20201700222
Narain, U. (2021). Banking on protected areas: Promoting sustainable protected area tourism to benefit local economies. World Bank Report. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/events/2021/06/14/banking-on-protected-areas-promoting-sustainable-protected-area-tourism-to-benefit-local-communities
Newsome, D., & Dowling, R. (2017). Geoheritage and geotourism. In Reynard, E., & Brilha, J. (Eds.), Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management (1st Edition) (pp. 305-321). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7. 00017-4
Peterson, B. A., Brownlee, M. T., Hallo, J. C., Beeco, J. A., White, D. L., Sharp, R. L., & Cribbs, T. W. (2020). Spatiotemporal variables to understand visitor travel patterns: A management-centric approach. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 31, 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2020.100316
Phumsathan, S., Panyo, P., Pongpattananurak, N., & Udomwitid, S. (2022). Assessment of Tourism Development Potential Based on Tourism Components in Buffer Zone of Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Uthai Thani Province. ABAC Journal, 42(4), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.14456/abacj.2022.56
Phumsathan, S., Pongpattananurak, N., Udomwitid, S., Chaisawataree, T., & Dech-Um P. (2016). Sustainable Tourism Development in National Reserved Forest Guidebook. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) and Thailand Research Fund (TRF).
Ramchurjee, N. A. (2013). Understanding the relationship between tourists’ motivations and their experience and satisfaction. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 2(3), 1758-1769.
Richards, G. (2020). Tourism in challenging times: resilience or creativity?. Tourism Today, 19, 8-15.
Roengtam, S., & Agustiyara, A. (2022). Collaborative governance for forest land use policy implementation and development. Cogent social sciences, 8(1), 2073670. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2073670
Royal Forest Department. (2017). Royal Forest Department Strategic Plan 2017 - 2036. Royal Forest Department.
Royal Forest Department. (2021). Annual Report 2021. Royal Forest Department.
Royal Forest Department. (2023). Annual Report 2023. Royal Forest Department.
Royal Gazette. (1964). National Reserved Forests Act. Volume 81, chapter 38.
Schindler, S., Poirazidis, K., Ruiz, C., Scandolara, C., Cárcamo, B., Eastham, C., & Catsadorakis, G. (2015). At the crossroads from Asia to Europe: spring migration of raptors and black storks in Dadia National Park (Greece). Journal of Natural History, 49(5-8), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2013.836760
Somton, S. (2022). Guidelines for Integrated National Reserved Forest Land Management (revised version) [Presentation Document]. Forest Land Management Office, Royal Forest Department.
Svoronou, E., & Holden, A. (2005). Ecotourism as a tool for nature conservation: the role of WWF Greece in the Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli Forest Reserve in Greece. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 13(5), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966958050866 8573
U.S. Forest Service. (2008). Conflict management through the implementation of a collaborative process: Travel management planning on the Logan Ranger District of the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest. U.S. Forest Service.
U.S. Forest Service. (2021). Recreational Activities. U.S. Forest Service. Retrieved from https://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/reservations
UNWTO. (1995). Concepts, Definitions, and Classifications for Tourism Statistics. UNWTO.
Weaver, D. B. (2001). Ecotourism as mass tourism: Contradiction or reality?. Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly, 42(2), 104-112. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0010-8804(01)80022-7
World Bank. (2018). Growing Wildlife-Based Tourism Sustainably: A New Report and Q&A. World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2018/ 03/01/growing-wildlife-based-tourism-sustainably-a-new-report-and-qa
Zannat, N. A. (2018). Measuring tourists’ satisfaction with forest-based tourism attractions in Sylhet: The case of Lawachara national park. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Sports, 39, 30-38.
Zhou, B., Liu, S., Yu, H., Zhu, D., & Xiong, Q. (2022). Perceived benefits and forest tourists consumption intention: Environmental protection attitude and resource utilization attitude as mediators. Forests, 13(5), 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/f1 3050812
Zhang, L., Wu, C., & Hao, Y. (2022). Effect of the development level of facilities for forest tourism on tourists’ willingness to visit urban forest parks. Forests, 13(7), 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071005
Additional Files
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
