Taboo Language in Daily Conversations of English Education Students at HKBP Nommensen University

Sahlan Tampubolon; Aroon Fritz Ogest Malau; Susanti Susanti

doi:10.34050/els-jish.v9i1.50276

Authors

Sahlan Tampubolon Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
Aroon Fritz Ogest Malau Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
Susanti Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v9i1.50276

Keywords:

Taboo Language, Sociolinguistics, Student Conversation, SPEAKING Framework

Abstract

This study aims to identify the types of Indonesian taboo language used by fifth-semester students of the English Education Study Program at HKBP Nommensen University and to analyze the contextual factors influencing their use in daily conversations. Taboo language frequently appears in informal communication and reflects social interaction patterns among students. This research employed a descriptive qualitative method. The data were collected through natural observation and audio recordings of students’ conversations around the ground floor area of Building L at HKBP Nommensen University. A total of 193 taboo expressions were identified from 35 speech events. The data were analyzed using the classification of taboo language proposed by Edwin L. Battistella, while the contextual analysis was interpreted through the SPEAKING model developed by Dell Hymes. The findings reveal that epithets are the most frequently used type of taboo language in students’ conversations. These expressions are commonly used in informal interactions to express emotions, humor, and solidarity among peers. The study indicates that taboo language in this context functions not only as offensive language but also as a strategy for maintaining social bonding among students.

References

Adinda, R., Sosrohadi, S., Syafitri, B. A., & Andini, C. (2025). Cognitive And Cultural Barriers In Synonim Acquisition: A Psycolinguistic Study Of Indonesian Learners Of Korean. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(4), 881-888.

Alhakimi, D., Soepriyanti, H., Waluyo, U., & Mahyuni, M. (2024). Educational values of taboo expressions in the Sasak speech community: An ethnography study. Journal of Language and Culture Studies, 11(2), 33– 49.

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press. approach) [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Airlangga].

Andini, C., Youngsun, K., Sunnuraini, S., & Warouw, D. S. (2026). Developing a Chunk-Based Learning Model to Improve Korean Speaking Skills for Beginner Learners. International Journal of L2CT, 1(2), 156-172.

Anggriyani, D., Pammu, A., Rahman, F., & Sahib, H. (2025, July). Sociocultural Dynamics and Their Impact on Speaking Proficiency Among Higher Education Students. In Proceedings of International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology (Vol. 11, pp. 87-95).

Aswad, M., Rahman, F., Said, I. M., Hamuddin, B., & Nurchalis, N. F. (2019). A software to increase English learning outcomes: An acceleration model of English as the second language. The Asian EFL Journal, 26(6.2), 157.

Battistella, E. L. (2005). Bad language: Are some words better than others? Oxford University Press.

Chalak, A. (2025). Unveiling the speech act of taboo: A critical synthesis and systematic review of Iranian research articles. Handbook of Persian Discourse Studies, 405.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Hary, T. (2020). The study of taboo and euphemism on the English Department students in Universitas Pamulang. Unpublished thesis, Universitas Pamulang.

Hasnah, Y., Kharisma, A. J., & Fibay, L. (2022). A study of taboo words among students in the classroom interaction. English Teaching and Linguistics Journal (ETLiJ), 3(2), 135–145.

Husain, W., Wasif, S., & Fatima, I. (2023). Profanity as a self-defense mechanism and an outlet for emotional catharsis in stress, anxiety, and depression.Depression Research and Treatment, 2023, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8821517

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach.University of Pennsylvania Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M, Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pratiwi, N. I., Sosrohadi, S., Rahman, F., Dalyan, M., & Andini, C. (2026). The use of code-mixing by edu-influencers in social media: A communication strategy in sociolinguistic perspective. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 11(1), 1034-1042.

Prihandoko, L. A., Tembang, Y., Marpaung, D. N., & Rahman, F. (2019, October). English language competence for tourism sector in supporting socio-economic development in Merauke: A Survey Study. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 343, No. 1, p. 012170). IOP Publishing.

Salsabila, L. J., & Hadiansyah, D. (2024). Kosakata tabu dalam interaksi mahasiswa Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 4(1), 63–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.36722/psn.v4i1.3526

Said, M. M., Rita, F., Weda, S., & Rahman, F. (2021). English language performance development through extracurricular activities at Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Tadulako University Palu. PalArch's Journal of Archaelogy of Egypt/Egyptology.

Sasabone, C., Saud, J., Bagea, I., Hidir, A., & Munawir, A. (2024). Forensic linguistic exploration of the use of taboo words in everyday communication. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 10(1), 43–57.

Setyaningtias, S., Heriyanto, E., & Muhid, A. (2023). The use of swearing words of young multicultural students: A sociolinguistics study. Language and Culture Journal, 8(2), 112–123.

Tambunsaribu, G. (2023). The use of rude words by Indonesian teenagers: A sociolinguistic case. Indonesian Journal of Language and Society, 7(2), 101–116.

Tristiani, N. K. I., Budasi, I. G., & Ramendra, D. P. (2024). Taboo in Balinese language spoken in Nusa Penida based on Tri Hita Karana concept. The Art of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TATEFL), 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.36663/tatefl.v5i1.646

Wahyuni, T. S. (2024). A study on the use of taboo words by the male students of the English Department.Airlangga University (A sociolinguistics

Wardani, V., Mujiburrahman, Junaidi, & Kamil, A. I. (2023). Language taboos in social activities of the Acehnese community. Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities, 5(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.25077/aijosh.v5i2.53

Weda, S., Atmowardoyo, H., Rahman, F., Said, M. M., & Sakti, A. E. F. (2021). Factors Affecting Students' Willingness to Communicate in EFL Classroom at Higher Institution in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 719-734.

Weda, S., Rahman, F., Samad, I. A., Gunawan, F., & Fitriani, S. S. (2022). How Millennials Can Promote Social Harmony through Intercultural Communication at Higher Education. Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 3(1), 231-243.

Yaumi, M. T. A. H., Rahman, F., & Sahib, H. (2023). Exploring WhatsApp as Teaching and Learning Activities during Covid-19/New Normal era: A Semiotic Technology Analysis. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(12), 7627-7634.

Youngsun, K., Sosrohadi, S., Andini, C., Adinda, R., Jae, P. K., Yookyung, K., & Jung, S. (2024). Beyond the Korean Wave: Understanding the Motivation of Among Indonesian Gen Z to Learn Korean in the K-Pop Trend. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(06).