The Politeness Strategies of Criticism in Gorontalo Community: A Socio-pragmatic Study

Authors

  • Fajrul Shidiq Djunu Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i1.43436

Keywords:

criticism, politeness strategies, Gorontalo community

Abstract

Criticism is a speech act that tends to damage social relationships between individuals. Therefore, criticism needs to be constructed in such a way using politeness strategies so that the level of threat that can damage interpersonal relationships can be reduced. This socio-pragmatic study aims to find out how politeness strategies are applied in speech acts of criticism used by the Gorontalo community in different situations. The Gorontalo people are one of the tribal groups in Indonesia located on the island of Sulawesi, which has language and cultural differences with other Indonesian tribes. This study uses the Discourse Completion Task (DCT) as the data collection technique, which is an elicitation method in the form of a questionnaire equipped with situational descriptions to facilitate completion. The questionnaire, containing nine different situations designed to trigger criticism. The DCT was distributed to 45 Gorontalo people who have different backgrounds. The results of the data analysis in this study show that in conveying criticism, the Gorontalo community employed the forms of politeness strategies include bald-on record, positive politeness, negative politeness, and off-record. Furthermore, this community tends to use politeness strategies that are influenced by two factors: the situational context and the social context. The situational context refers to the specific situation that triggers criticism. Meanwhile, the social context refers to the difference in social class between speakers and interlocutors, where the older/higher the position, the more polite the language used.

References

Alhusein, M. (2024). Reprimand strategies in Arabic within Saudi Arabian society. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse, 32(1), 24-41.

Al Kayed, M., & Al-Ghoweri, S. (2019). Speech act strategies of criticism in Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 80-96.

Andini, C., Yassi, A.H., & Sukmawaty. (2021). The use of honorifics in English and Buginese with special reference to bone language: A comparative study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(7), 873-877.

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.

Bachriani, B., Yassi, A. H., & Rahman, F. (2018). A Comparative Study of Euphemism in English and Buginese: Pragmatic Stylistics Contexts. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 1(4), 429-440.

Bloomer, A. (2006). Describing and interpreting data in qualitative research. Routledge.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Dawson, C. (2007). A practical guide to research methods. How To Books.

El-Dakhs, D., Ali, N., & Mustaffa, A. (2019). Pragmatic approaches to criticism: A comparative study in Egyptian Arabic and Malaysian Malay. Linguistics and Culture Review, 4(1), 67-82.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Aldine Publishing.

Hidayat, N. N., Rahman, F., & Abas, A. (2023). Language Politeness on Instagram: A Case Study of Public Officer at Jakarta, Indonesia. Tekstual, 21(2), 100-109.

Hosseinizadeh, M., & Moqadam, F. (2019). Cross-cultural perceptions of criticism in online interactions: A comparative study of Persian and American Facebook users. Journal of Cross-Cultural Pragmatics, 15(2), 48-65.

Jauhari, S. (2018). Politeness strategies in criticism: A study of the Javanese people in Surabaya. Indonesian Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Studies, 19(3), 112-128.

Lanta, J., Rahman, F., Lewa, I., & Akhmar, A. M. (2022). Respect for Nature in Indonesian Children’s Fiction: Ecocriticism Perspective. Webology, 19(1), 6010-6021.

Leech, G. N. (1993). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (1988). Javanese ethics and world-view: The Javanese idea of the good life. Oxford University Press.

Said, M. M., Rita, F., Weda, S., & Rahman, F. (2021). English Language Performance Development Through Extracurricular Activities At Faculty Of Teacher Training And Education Tadulako University Palu. PalArch's Journal of Archaelogy of Egypt/Egyptology.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

Sukmawaty, Rahman, F. F., & Andini, C. (2022). Covid-19 Pandemic and Axiology of Communication: A Study of Linguistic Phenomena. IJISRT, 7(4).

Downloads

Published

2025-03-20

How to Cite

Shidiq Djunu, F. (2025). The Politeness Strategies of Criticism in Gorontalo Community: A Socio-pragmatic Study. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(1), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i1.43436

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.