Abstract
This paper aims to reveal the knowledge of the Gayo community about buffalo ethnotaxonomy so as to provide a good alternative for sustainability issues in maintaining local wisdom and identity. This research was conducted in Gayo Lues Regency using a qualitative approach because the main purpose of this study was to explore the knowledge and understanding of the Gayo community based on the emic perspective of the community regarding the classification of buffalo species. The data collection techniques used participatory observation, in-depth interviews, FGDs and document studies. The results showed that the knowledge of the Gayo community regarding the genetic ethnotaxonomy of buffalo can be seen from their ability to classify livestock types based on gender, skin color and horn shape owned by buffalo. There are six types of horns identified, namely: Caweng / Gaweng, Gonok, Gampang, Durung / Cakah, Rukup, Rebah, and Gope / Gupik. As for skin color, there are four categories, namely segem, jeged, impil-impil and sawak. The shape and characteristics possessed are indicators in determining the quality of the buffalo because it is correlated with the ability to endure, have energy and the quality of the meat produced. Knowledge of this matter is very useful for parties with an interest in the world of livestock to be used as a basis for policy making.
References
Gusti, “Indonesia Kehilanggan 75% Keanekaragaman Sumberdaya Genetik Tanaman Pertanian”, Berita dipublish pada http://www.ugm.ac.id/id/berita/16887-indonesia-kehilangan-75-keanekaragaman-sumber daya-genetik-tanaman-pertanian, (2018).
Indopos, “Krisis Pangan Ancam Indonesia”, Berita pada edisi 22 September 2017, (2017), pp. 1&7.
Mourao, J.S., H.F. & Almeida, F.S, “Etnotaxonomy of Mastofauna as Practised by Hunters of the Municipality of Paulista, State of Paraiba-Brazil”, Journal Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine., 19 February (2006).
Nasution, “Identifikasi Stakeholder dan Analisis Aktor Serta Kelembagaan Terkait Isu Publik Pengembangan Kawasan Peternakan Kerbau Berbasis Kearifan Lokal di Gayo Lues”, Aceh Anthropological Journal., Vol (4) No. (2) (2020).
Marshall, Catherine & Rossman, Gretchen B., “Designing qualitative research”, Newbr Park, CA: Sage, (1989).
Schensul, Stephhen L.; Jean J. & LeCompte, Margaret D., “Essential Ethhnographic methods; observations, interviews, and questionnaires”, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, (1999).
Spradley J. P., “The Ethnographic Interview, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,, Inc, (1979).
Kurnianto, E., “Sumber Daya Genetik Ternak Lkal”, Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Agribisnis Peternakan (Stap) Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Jenderal Sudirman, Indonesia, 23 Mei (2018)
Stavenhhagen, Rodolfo, “Ethnodevelopment A Neglected Dimension in Development Thinking in Development Studies: Critique and Renewal by R. Aphtorpe; A. Krahl (Eds) Leiden: E.J. Brill also published on Pioneer on Indigenous Right, SperingerBriefs On Pioneers in Science and Practice. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34150-2_2, (1986).
Arafah, Nur dan Amar Ma’ruf. The Adaptation of Local Wisdom as a Solution to Environmental Conservation in Small Islands. Artikel pada Proceeding of the Celebes International Confrence on Diversity in Wallacea’s Line (CICDWL). Kendari, 8-10 Mei (2015)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia