Indicators to Evaluate the Institutional Effectiveness of National Climate Financing Mechanisms
Additional Files
Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /home/journal33/public_html/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.inc.php on line 49
Over the past few decades, tackling climate change has persistently featured in international discussions, with the main issues centring on mobilising adequate global response and effectively coordinating and channelling this response at the sub-national levels. In order to effectively mobilize and harmonize resources to address climate change at country level, the idea of establishing national climate finance institutions (NCFIs) with the duty to mobilise, manage and allocate funds to implement climate change actions has gained prominence among developing countries. This study develops an indicator-based framework to evaluate the institutional effectiveness of the Indonesian Climate Change Trust Fund (ICCTF) as a case study. Building on previous frameworks and principles of climate finance, a total of 21 indicators were identified, these indicators were categorized into five effectiveness components, which are: were identified, and these indicators were categorized into five effectiveness components, which include: legal and regulatory framework, fund mobilization and sustainability, fund management and allocation, monitoring and evaluation, and transparency and accountability. We find that the major and fundamental weakness of the ICCTF is its inability to adequately mobilize funds, while its strength is in management and allocation of available resources. Inclusion of the legal and regulatory framework component, which has been largely absent in previous studies, further enabled us to identify critical legal gaps in the operationalization of the ICCTF. While the current legal foundation of the ICCTF ensures transparency and accountability, it significantly constrains the ICCTFs flexibility and innovative potentials.
Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global environmental change, 15(2), 77-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005
Ameyaw, E.E, & Chan, A.P.C. (2015). Risk allocation in public-private partnership water supply projects in Ghana, Construction Management and Economics. Routledge, 33(3). 187–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1031148
Ayers, J., Huq, S., Wright, H., Faisal, A. M., & Hussain, S. T. (2014). Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into development in Bangladesh. Climate and Development, 6(4), 293-305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2014.977761
Ayers, J, & Dodman, D. (2010). Climate change adaptation and development I: The state of the debate. Progress in Development Studies, 10(2), 161–168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/146499340901000205
Barrett, S. (2014). Subnational Climate Justice? Adaptation Finance Distribution and Climate Vulnerability. World Development, (58) 130–142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.014
Barrett, S. (2013). Local level climate justice? Adaptation finance and vulnerability reduction. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1819-1829. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.015
Biermann, F., & Gupta, A. (2011) Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: a research framework. Ecological Economics, (70)11. 1856–1864. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.008
Bird, N., Tilley, H., Canales, T. Trujillo, N., Tumushabe, G., Welham, B., & Yanda, P. (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of public climate finance delivery at the national level. London: Overseas Development Institute. Available at: http://www.odi.org.uk/publications/7342measuring-effectiveness-public-climate-finance-delivery-national-domestic-level
Bladon, A., Mohammed, Y., & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2014). A Review of Conservation Trust Funds for Sustainable Marine Resources Management: Conditions for Success. A working paper produced by IIED’s Sustainable Markets Group. London, UK. Retrieved from www.iied.org@iiedwww.facebook.com/theIIEDhttp://pubs.iied.org/16574IIED
Booth, D. (2012). Aid effectiveness: Bringing country ownership (and politics) back in. Conflict, Security and Develoment, 12(5) 537-558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2012.744184
Bours, D., McGinn, C., & Pringle, P. (2015) ‘Editors’ note. Monitoring and Evaluation of Climate Change Adaptation: A Review of the Landscape’. New Directions for Evaluation.(147), 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20127
Bowman, M., & Steenmans, K. (2018) Climate Finance Law: legal readiness for climate finance. Report and Findings of Workshop held at King’s College London 9-11 March 2018. London, UK: King College.
Bowman, M., & Steenmans, K. (2019). Legal Readiness for Climate Finance: Private Sector Opportunities. Report and Findings of Roundtable held at King’s College London, 25 January 2019. London: King’s College London.
Brooks, N., & Fisher, S. (2013). TAMD - tracking adaptation and measuring development: A step-by-step guide. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Buchner, B., & Wilkinson, J. (2012) ‘Public Climate Finance : A Survey of Systems to Monitor and Evaluate Climate Finance Effectiveness’. London, Uk: Climate Policy Initiative, pp. 10–12
Chaum, M., Faris, C., Wagner, G., & Brown, J. (2011). Improving the Effectiveness of Climate Finance: Key Lessons. Washington DC: Brookings Institute
Christiansen, L., Ray, A. D., Smith, J. B., & Haites, E. (2012). Accessing International Funding for Climate Change Adaptation. A Guidebook for Developing Countries. TNA Guidebook Series. UNEP Risø Centre on Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development, Rosklide, Denmark.
Colenbrander, S., Dodman, D., & Mitlin, D. (2018). Using climate finance to advance climate justice: the politics and practice of channelling resources to the local level. Climate Policy, 18(7) 902–915. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1388212
Denton, F. (2010). Financing adaptation in Least Developed Countries in West Africa: is finance the ‘real deal’? Climate Policy, 10 (6) 655–671. doi: https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2010.0149
Di Gregorio, M., Fatorelli, L., Paavola, J., Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Nurrochmat, D.R., May, P.H., Brockhaus, M., Sari, I.M., & Kusumadewi, S.D. (2019). Multi-level Governance and Power in Climate Change Policy Networks. Global Environmental Change, (54) 64–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.003
Di Gregorio, M., Nurrochmat, D.R., Paavola, J., Sari, I.M., Fatorelli, L., Pramova, E., Locatelli, B., Brockhaus, M., & Kusumadewi, S.D. (2017). Climate policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages. Environmental Science & Policy, 67, 35-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.004
Dore, J., & Lebel, L. (2010). Gaining public acceptance: a critical strategic priority of the World Commission on Dams, Water Alternatives, 3 (2) 154–171.
Douxchamps, S., Debevec, L., Giordano, M., & Barron, J. (2017). Monitoring and evaluation of climate resilience for agricultural development – A review of currently available tools. World Development Perspectives, (5)10–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2017.02.001
Erbaugh, J. T., & Nurrochmat, D. R. (2019). Paradigm shift and business as usual through policy layering: Forest-related policy change in Indonesia (1999-2016). Land use policy, 86, 136-146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.021
Ellis, J., Caruso, R., & Ockenden, S. (2013). Exploring Climate Finance Effectiveness. Climate Change Expert Group Paper No. 2013(4). Paris: OECD.
Fankhauser, S., & Burton, I. (2011). Spending adaptation money wisely. Climate Policy, (11)3, 1037-1049. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.582389
Faulkner, L., Ayers, J., & Huq, S. (2015). Meaningful measurement for community-based adaptation. In D. Bours, C. McGinn, & P. Pringle (Eds.), Monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation: A review of the landscape. New Directions for Evaluation, 147, 89–104.
Findley, M.G., Milner, H.V., & Nielson D.L. (2017). The choice among aid donors: The effects of multilateral vs. bilateral aid on recipient behavioral support. Review of International Organizations, 12(2), 307–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-017-9275-2
Flynn, C. (2011). Blending Climate Finance through National Climate Funds: A guidebook for the design and establishment of national funds to achieve climate change priorities. United Nations Development Program. New York, NY: UNDP.
Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., Biesbroek, R., Araos, M., Austin, S. E., & Lesnikowski, A. (2015). Adaptation tracking for a post-2015 climate agreement. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 967-969. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2744
Ford, J.D., Berrang-Ford, L., Lesnikowski, A., Barrera, M., & Heymann, S.J. (2013). How to track adaptation to climate change: a typology of approaches for national-level application. Ecology and Society, 18(3) 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05732-180340
Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, (17)4-5, 663-671. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469955
Girod, D. (2008). Cut from the Same Cloth? Multilateral vs. Bilateral Aid. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Political Economy Society. Philadelphia, PA
Glemarec, Y. (2011). Catalyzing Climate Finance A Guidebook on Policy and Financing Options to Support Green, Low-Emission and Climate- Resilient Development, United Nations Development Program UNDP, April 2011. New York, NY USA.
Grüning, C., Menzel, C., Shuford, L.S, &Sonntag-O’Brien, V. (2012). National Climate Finance Institution Support Programme. Case Study: The Indonesia Climate Change Trust Fund (ICCTF). Frankfurt GN: UNEP.
Gupta, A., & Mason M. (2016). Disclosing or obscuring? The politics of transparency in global climate governance. Current Opinionsin Environmental Sustainability.(11) 1882–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.004
Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., Meijerink, S., van den Brink, M., Jong, P., Nooteboom, S., & Bergsma, E. (2010). The Adaptive Capacity Wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science and Policy (13) 459-471.
Hall, S., Foxon, TJ., & Bolton, R. (2017). Investing in low-carbon transitions: energy finance as an adaptive market. Climate Policy 17 (3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1094731
Haasnoot, M., van’t Klooster, S., & Van Alphen, J. (2018). Designing a monitoring system to detect signals to adapt to uncertain climate change. Global Environmental Change, 52, 273-285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.003
Halimanjaya, A., Nakhooda, S., & Barnard, S. (2014). The effectiveness of climate finance: a review of the Indonesia Climate Change Trust Fund. Working paper for the Overseas Development Institute. London: ODI.
Hanger, S., Pfenninger, S., Dreyfus, M., & Patt, A. (2013). Knowledge and information needs of adaptation policymakers: a European study. Regional Environmental Change, (13)91-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0317-2
Harmeling, S., & Kaloga, A. (2011). Understanding the political economy of the adaptation fund. IDS Bulletin, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp.23–32.
Hein, J., Guarin, A., Frommé, E., & Pauw, P. (2018). Deforestation and the Paris climate agreement: An assessment of REDD+ in the national climate action plans. Forest Policy and Economics, 90, 7-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.005
Irawan, S., Heikens, A., & Kevin, P. (2012).National Climate Funds: Learning from the experience of Asia-Pacific countries. UNDP discussion paper. Washington DC: UNDP.
Kotchen, M.J., & Costello, C. (2018). Maximizing the impact of climate finance: Funding projects or pilot projects? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, (92) 270-281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.08.009
Lamhauge, N., Lanzi, E., Agrawal, E., & Agrawala, S. (2012). Monitoring evaluation for adaptation: lessons from development cooperation agencies. OECD Environment Working Papers 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en
Lebel, L., Salamanca, A., & Kallayanamitra, C. (2017).The governance of adaptation financing: pursuing legitimacy at multiple levels, International Journal of Global Warming, (11)2.226–245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2017.082181
Lesnikowski, A., Ford, J., Biesbroek, R., Berrang-Ford, L., Maillet, M., Araos, M., & Austin, S. E. (2017). What does the Paris Agreement mean for adaptation?. Climate Policy, 17(7), 825-831. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1248889
Mehrotra, S. (2006). Governance and basic social services: ensuring accountability in service delivery through deep democratic decentralization. Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, 18(2), 263-283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1219
Molenaers, N., Dellepiane, S., & Faust, J. ( 2015). Political Conditionality and Foreign Aid. World Developent 75(8):2–12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.04.001.
Morita, T., & Pak, C. (2018). Legal readiness to attract climate finance: Towards a low-carbon Asia and the Pacific. CCLR, 6.
Moss, R.H., Meehl, G.A., Lemos, M.C., Smith, J.B., Arnold, J.R., Arnott, J.C., Behar,D., Brasseur, G.P., Broomell, S.B., & Busalacchi, A.J. (2013). Hell and high water: practice-relevant adaptation science. Science, 342(6159), 696-698. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1239569
Nakhooda, S., & Amin, A.L. (2013). The effectiveness of climate finance: a review of the Clean Technology Fund. Working paper for the Overseas Development Institute (ODI). March. London: ODI.
Nakhooda, S. (2013). The effectiveness of international climate finance. Working Paper 371 Results of ODI research presented in preliminary form for discussion and critical comment. London UK: ODI.
Nakhooda, S., & Watson, C. (2019). The Global Climate Finance Architecture. Climate Funds Update, Overseas Development institute ODI. London UK.
Nakhooda, S., Norman, S., Barnard, S., Greenhill, R., Caravani, A.T., & Banton, G. (2014). Climate Finance: Is It Making a Difference? A Review of the Effectiveness of Multilateral Climate Funds. London: Overseas Development Institute.
Nelson, R., Kokic, P., Crimp, S., Martin, P., Meinke, H., Howden, S.M., de Voil, P., & Nidumolu, U. (2010). The vulnerability of Australian rural communities to climate variability and change. Part II. Integrating impacts with adaptive capacity. Environmental Science and Policy, (13) 18–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.007
Nicholson, K., Beloe, T., & Hodes, G. (2017). Hard Choices Integrated Approaches: A Guidance Note on Climate Change Financing Frameworks. United Nations Development Program (UNDP).
Norman, M., & Nakhooda, S. (2015). The state of REDD+ Finance. In: CGD Climate and Forest Paper Series #5. Washington, D.C.: Center for Global Development.
Norris, R. (2000). The IPG Handbook on Environmental Funds. A resource book for design and operation of environmental funds, New York: PACT Publications. Available at: www.geocities.com/shores_system/ef/ef_handbook.html
Nurrochmat, D. R., Boer, R., Ardiansyah, M., Immanuel, G., & Purwawangsa, H. (2020). Policy forum: Reconciling palm oil targets and reduced deforestation: Landswap and agrarian reform in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 119, 102291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102291
Olazabal, M., Galarraga, I., Ford, J., De Murieta, E.S., & Lesnikowski, A. (2019). Are local climate adaptation policies credible; A conceptual and operational assessment framework. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development. 11(3)277-296, doi: https://doi.org//10.1080/19463138.2019.1583234
Owusu, E.K., Chan, A.C., Yang, J., & Parn, E. (2020). Towards corruption-free cities: Measuring the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures in infrastructure project procurement and management in Hong Kong’, Cities, 96 (August 2019), p. 102435. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102435
Peters, I., Christoplos, I., Funder, M., Friis-Hansen, E., & Pain, A. (2012). Understanding institutional change: a review of selected literature for the climate change and rural institutions research program. DIIS Working Paper 2012.12. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
Preston, B. L., Rickards, L., Fünfgeld, H., & Keenan, R. J. (2015). Toward reflexive climate adaptation research. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 14, 127-135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.002
Preston, B.L., Westaway, R.M., & Yuen, E.J. (2011). Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitigation and Adaptation, Strategies for Global Change, (16) 407-438. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9270-x
Rai, N., Kaur, N., Greene, S., Wang, B., & Steele, P. (2015). A Guide to National Governance of Climate Finance. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). London, Uk. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12774/eod_tg.march2015.rainetal
Richards, J., & Schalatek, L. (2017). Financing Loss & Damage. A Look at Governance and Implementation Options. Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/loss_and_damage_finance_paper_update_16_may_2017.pdf?dimension1=division_oen
Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & Uittenbroek, C. (2014). Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy integration. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24 (4), 233–246. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.1647
Samuwai, J., & Hills, J.M. (2018). Assessing Climate Finance Readiness in the Asia-Pacific Region. Sustainability, (10) 1192; doi: 10.3390/su10041192
Sahide, M. A. K., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Giessen, L. (2015). The regime complex for tropical rainforest transformation: Analysing the relevance of multiple global and regional land use regimes in Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 47, 408-425. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.030
Schalatek, L., & Bird, N. (2016). The Principles and Criteria of Public Climate Finance – A Normative Framework. Climate Funds Update (CFU)/Climate Finance Fundamentals 1, November 2016. Hbs North America: ODI.
Schipper, L. (2007). Climate change adaptation and development: Exploring the linkages. Tyndall Centre Working Paper Series 107. Norwich, UK. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
Scobie, M. (2016). Policy coherence in climate governance in Caribbean small island developing states. Environmental Science & Policy, 58, 16-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.008
Smyth, S. (2009). A practical guide to creating a collective financing effort to save the world: The global environment facility experience. Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev., 22, 29.
Smyth, S. (2011). Agency and Accountability in Multilateral Development Finance: An Agenda for Change. The Law and Development Review: 4(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.2202/1943-3867.1113
Spergel, B., & Taïeb, P. (2008). Rapid Review of Conservation Trust Funds, Prepared for the CFA Working Group on Environmental Funds. Conservation Finance Alliance (CFA), Washington DC, USA.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha, International Journal of Medical Education, (2)53–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Tippmann, R., Agoumi, A., Perroy, L., Doria, M., Henders, S., & Goldmann, R. (2013). Assessing barriers and solutions to financing adaptation projects in Africa. A report submitted to the International Development Research Centre. Toronto: International Development Research Centre.
Vanderweerd, V., Glemarec, Y., & Billett, S. (2014). Readiness for Climate Finance: A Framework for Understanding What It Means to Be Ready to Use Climate Finance. United Nations Development Program 2014; pp. 1–28. New York, NY: UNDP.
Vij, S., Moors, E., Ahmad, B., Arfanuzzaman, M.D., Bhadwal, S., Biesbroek, R., Gioli, G., Groot, A., Mallick, D., Regmi, B., Saeed, B.A., Ishaq, S., Thapa, B., Werners, S.E., & Wester, P. (2017). Climate adaptation approaches and key policy characteristics: Cases from South Asia. Environmental Science and Policy, (78)58–65.
Watson, C., & Schalatek, L. (2019). The Global Climate Finance Architecture. Climate Finance Fundamentals 2 Overseas Development Institute. February. London: ODI.
Weiler, F., Klöck, C., & Dornan, M. (2018). Vulnerability, good governance, or donor interests? The allocation of aid for climate change adaptation. World Development, 104, 65-77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.001
Yates, J.S. (2014). Power and politics in the governance of community-based adaptation. In: J. Ensor, R. Berger, & Huq, S. (Eds.). Community-based adaptation to climate change: Emerging lessons. Rubgy, United Kingdom: Practical Action Publication.
Copyright (c) 2020 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
