Seasonal Dynamics of Tropical Forest Vegetation in Ngoc Linh Nature Reserve, Vietnam Based on UAV Data
Additional Files
Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /home/journal33/public_html/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.inc.php on line 49
Seasonal dynamics in tropical forests are closely related to the variation in forest canopy gaps. The canopy gaps change continuously in shape and size between the rainy and dry seasons, leading to the variation in the vegetative indicators. To monitor the variation of the canopy gaps, UAVs were used to collect datas in the mentioned tropical forests at an altitude of over 1,000m in Ngoc Linh Nature Reserve, Vietnam with a post-processing image resolution of about 8cm, which allows the detection of relatively small gaps. The analysis results at 10 squares of 1 ha showed a decrease in the area of canopy gaps from the rainy season in September 2019 to the dry season of May 2020. The mixed broad-leaved or broadleaf forest dominates with a greater variation, when the area of the gaps decreases significantly. The variation in forest canopy gaps and vegetative indicators are closely related to the high differentiation of terrain, the seasonal and the dry season climatic characteristics. The fluctuation of the vegetation cover affects the habitats of the species under the forest canopy such as animals, birds and soil fauna. This is one of the scientific bases that contributes to the management and conservation of flora and fauna biodiversity, especially in mountainous tropical forests such as Ngoc Linh Nature Reserve.
Anderson, K., & Gaston, K. (2013). Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1890/120150
Banu, T., Borlea, G., & Banu, C. (2016). The Use of Drones in Forestry. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.17265/2162-5263/2016.11.007
Betts, H., Brown, L., & Stewart, G. (2005). Forest canopy gap detection and characterisation by the use of high-resolution Digital Elevation Models. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 29.
Bongjoh, C., & Mama, N. (2020). Early regeneration of commercial timber species in a logged-over forest of southern Cameroon. Tropenbos International.
Brokaw, N., & Busing, R. (2000). Niche versus Chance and Tree Diversity in Forest Gaps. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15, 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01822-x
Brovkina, O., Cienciala, E., Surovy, P., & Janata, P. (2018). Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for assessment of qualitative classification of Norway spruce in temperate forest stands. Geo-spatial Information Science, 21, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2017.1416994
Bullock, E., Woodcock, C., & Olofsson, P. (2018). Monitoring tropical forest degradation using spectral unmixing and Landsat time series analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.011
Caron, M.-N., Kneeshaw, D., Grandpré, L., Kauhanen, H., & Kuuluvainen, T. (2009). Canopy Gap Characteristics and Disturbance Dynamics in Old-Growth Picea abies Stands in Northern Fennoscandia: Is the Forest in Quasi-Equilibrium? Annales Botanici Fennici, 46, 251-262. https://doi.org/10.5735/085.046.0402
Chung, C.-H., & Huang, C.-y. (2020). Hindcasting tree heights in tropical forests using time-series unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 290, 108029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108029
Collins, B., Dunne, K., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1985). Responses of Forest Herbs to Canopy Gaps. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-050495-7.50017-X
Csillik, O., Kumar, P., & Asner, G. (2020). Challenges in Estimating Tropical Forest Canopy Height from Planet Dove Imagery. Remote Sensing, 12, 1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071160
Denslow, J. S. (1987). Tropical Rainforest Gaps and Tree Species Diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18(1), 431-451. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.002243
Elhag, M. (2015). Tropical Forests Mapping of Bioko Island Using Remote Sensing Techniques. Journal of King Abdulaziz University - Meteorology, Environment and Arid Land Agriculture Sciences, 26, 95-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.4197/Met.26-2.10
Elliott, S., Baker, P., & Borchert, R. (2006). Leaf flushing during the dry season: The paradox of Asian monsoon forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 248-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00213.x
Elliott, S., Caldas, L., Nicolossi, G., Coradin, V., & Borchert, R. (2002). Increasing day-length induces flushing of tropical dry forest trees in the absence of rain. Trees, 16, 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-002-0185-3
Eysenrode, D., Kockelbergh, F., Bogaert, J., Impens, I., & Hecke, P. (2002). Canopy gap edge determination and the importance of gap edges for plant diversity. Web Ecology, 3, 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/we-3-1-2002
Fernandez-Diaz, J., Carter, W., Shrestha, R., & Glennie, C. (2020). LiDAR REmote Sensing. In J. N. Pelton, S. Madry, S. Camacho-Lara (eds.), Handbook of Satellite Applications (pp. 1-52). Springer International Publishing.
Forman, R., & Collinge, S. (1997). Nature conserved in changing landscapes with and without spatial planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37, 129-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00378-7
Gagnon, J., Jokela, E., Moser, W., & Huber, D. (2003). Characteristics of gaps and natural regeneration in mature longleaf pine flatwoods ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 187, 373-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.002
Getzin, S., Nuske, R., & Wiegand, K. (2014). Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) to Quantify Spatial Gap Patterns in Forests. Remote Sensing, 6, 6988-7004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs6086988
Gray, A., Spies, T., & Easter, M. (2002). Microclimatic and soil moisture responses to gap formation in coastal Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere, 32, 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-200
Hart, J., & Grissino-Mayer, H. (2009). Gap-scale disturbance processes in secondary hardwood stands on the Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee, USA. Forest Ecology: Recent Advances in Plant Ecology, 131-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9488-9
Hopkinson, C., & Chasmer, L. E. (2007). Modelling Canopy Gap Fraction from Lidar Intensity. In Proceedings of ISPRS Workshop on Laser Scanning 2007 and SilviLaser 2007, Espoo, Finland, September 12–14, 2007; In The International Archives of the Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. ISPRS: Vienna, Austria, Vol. XXXVI, Part 3/W52. pp. 190–194.
Hubbell, S.P. and Foster, R.B. (1986) Canopy Gaps and the Dynamics of a Neotropical Forest. In Crawley, M.J., (Ed.) Plant Ecology. pp. 77-96. Blackwell.
Jr, E. H., Doraiswamy, P., McMurtrey, J., Daughtry, C., Perry, E., & Akhmedov, B. (2013). A visible band index for remote sensing leaf Chlorophyll content at the Canopy Scale. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 21, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.07.020
Kimmins, J. (2004). Emulating Natural Forest Disturbance: What Does This Mean? In Perera A., Buse L., & Weber M. (Eds.), Emulating Natural Forest Landscape Disturbances: Concepts and Applications (pp. 8-28). Columbia University Press.
Kirchner, N., Hutter, K., Jakobsson, M., & Gyllencreutz, R. (2011). Capabilities and limitations of numerical ice sheet models: a discussion for Earth-scientists and modelers. Quaternary Science Reviews, 30(25-26), 3691-3704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.09.012
van der Maarel E. (1988) Vegetation dynamics: patterns in time and space. In: Miles J., Schmidt W., van der Maarel E. (eds) Temporal and Spatial Patterns of Vegetation Dynamics. Advances in vegetation science, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2275-4_1
Marchi, A., & Paletto, A. (2010). Relationship between forest canopy and natural regeneration in the subalpine spruce-larch forest (north-east Italy). Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A, 52. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.30770
Muscolo, A., Bagnato, S., Sidari, M., & Mercurio, R. (2014). A review of the roles of forest canopy gaps. Journal of Forestry Research, 25, 725-736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0521-7
Muscolo, A., Sidari, M., & Mercurio, R. (2007). Influence of gap size on organic matter decomposition, microbial biomass and nutrient cycle in Calabrian pine (Pinus laricio, Poiret) stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 242, 412-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.058
Ngo, D., Nguyen, H., Dang, C., & Kolesnikov, S. (2020). UAV application for assessing rainforest structure in Ngoc Linh nature reserve, Vietnam. E3S Web of Conferences, 203, 03006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020303006
Nieschulze, J., Zimmermann, R., A, B., & Schulze, E. D. (2012). An assessment of forest canopy structure by LiDAR: Derivation and stability of canopy structure parameters across forest management types. Forstarchiv, 83, 195-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.4432/0300-4112-83-195
Nikolaevich, K. A. (2015). Structure and dynamics of monsoon tropical forests of Vietnam. Moscow.
Rautiainen, M., Heiskanen, J., & Korhonen, L. (2012). Seasonal changes in canopy leaf area index and MODIS vegetation products for a boreal forest site in central Finland. Boreal Environment Research, 17.
Richards, P. W., Walsh, R. P. D., Baillie, I., & Greg-Smith, P. (1996). The tropical rain forest: An ecological study, Second edition. Cambridge University Press.
Trung, T. V. (1978). Forest vegetation in Vietnam. Science and Technology Publishing House.
Watt, A. (1947). Pattern and Process in the Plant Community. Journal of Ecology, 35, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2256497
Whitmore, T. (1989). Canopy Gaps and the Two Major Groups of Forest Trees. Ecology, 70(3), 536-538. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940195
Williams, L., Bunyavejchewin, S., & Baker, P. (2008). Deciduousness in a seasonal tropical forest in western Thailand: Interannual and intraspecific variation in timing, duration and environmental cues. Oecologia, 155, 571-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0938-1
Wulder, M., Bater, C., Coops, N., Hilker, T., & White, J. (2008). The role of LiDAR in sustainable forest management. The Forestry Chronicle, 84, 807-826. http://dx.doi.org/10.5558/tfc84807-6
Zahawi, R., Dandois, J., Holl, K., Nadwodny, D., Reid, J., & Ellis, E. (2015). Using lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles to monitor tropical forest recovery. Biological Conservation, 186, 287–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.031
Copyright (c) 2021 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice