New land governance models and management scenarios: Fitting Forest Management Units (FMUs) for forested landscapes outside forest zones in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v7i1.23962Keywords:
Fragmented governance, Land governance, Governance innovations, Forest management, KPH, Landscape approachAbstract
Many parts of non-forest zones (Areal untuk Penggunaaan Lain/APL) in Indonesia are forested but are however under intense pressure from unsustainable practices and conversion. To help preserve forested APL zones, the Ministry of Environment of Forestry is envisioning the integration of forested APL areas into the operational activities of the Forest Management Units/ FMUs (Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan/KPH), a management arm of the forest administration. Under the current governance arrangements, FMUs are not tasked to manage the areas. In this paper, we developed new governance arrangements and management scenarios that permit management of forested APL by FMUs based on iterative processes and intensive consultation with related stakeholders. We developed three plausible broad scenarios: 1) the handing over forested APLs to FMUs, 2) co-management, and 3) FMUs to provide technical assistance for preserving forested APLs. We further detailed the three scenarios into five different models. Our scenarios of institutional arrangements and management models are by no means prescriptive and readily operationalized on the ground. Instead, the processes by which the scenarios and models were developed can be adopted when the FMUs intend to develop more detailed scenarios that reflect specific situations and conditions.
References
Ardiansyah, F., Marthen, A. A., & Amalia, N. (2015). Forest and land-use governance in a decentralized Indonesia: A legal and policy review. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
Arts, B., Buizer, M., Horlings, L., Ingram, V., Van Oosten, C., & Opdam, P. (2017). Landscape approaches: a state-of-the-art review. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 439-463. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060932
Austin, K. G., Schwantes, A., Gu, Y., & Kasibhatla, P. S. (2019). What causes deforestation in Indonesia?. Environmental Research Letters, 14(2), 024007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf6db. 024007
Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M., Stryamets, N., & Johansson, K. E. (2011). Sustainable development and sustainability: Landscape approach as a practical interpretation of principles and implementation concepts. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 4(3), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0040-1
Bae, J. S. (2016). Perception of local community on forest partnership in indonesia: expectation and challenges-a case of forest partnership between forest management unit and local community in Lombok. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science, 105(3), 366-376. http://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2016.105.3.366
Balint, P. J., Stewart, R. E., Desai, A., & Walters, L. C. (2011). Wicked Environmental Problems: Managing Uncertainty and Conflict. Island Press.
Berenschot, W., & Van Klinken, G. (2018). Informality and citizenship: the everyday state in Indonesia. Citizenship studies, 22(2), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13621025.2018.1445494
Brandi, C., Cabani, T., Hosang, C., Schirmbeck, S., Westermann, L., & Wiese, H. (2015). Sustainability standards for palm oil: challenges for smallholder certification under the RSPO. The Journal of Environment & Development, 24(3), 292-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496515593775
Brockhaus, M., Obidzinski, K., Dermawan, A., Laumonier, Y., & Luttrell, C. (2012). An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: Is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+?. Forest policy and economics, 18, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.09.004
Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
Budiningsih, K., Nurfatriani, F., Salminah, M., Ulya, N. A., Nurlia, A., Setiabudi, I. M., & Mendham, D. S. (2022). Forest Management Units' Performance in Forest Fire Management Implementation in Central Kalimantan and South Sumatra. Forests, 13(6), 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13060894
Directorate General of Climate Change Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2018, July 11). KPH Sebagai Ujung Tombak Pelaksanaan REDD+ Di Tingkat Tapak dalam rangka Mendukung Pencapaian Target Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) Mitigasi Sektor Kehutanan. Retrieved from http://ditjenppi.menlhk. go.id/berita-ppi/3156-kph-sebagai%09ujungtombak% 09pelaksanaan-redd-di-tingkat-tapak-dalam-rangka-mendukung%09pencapaiantarget%09nationally-determined-contributions-ndc-mitigasi-sektor%09kehutanan.html
Ekawati, E., Rumboko, L., Rochmayanto, Y., Kushartini, S.F., & Muttaqin, Z. (2014). Kebijakan Land Swap Mungkinkah Dilakukan?. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial Ekonomi Kebijakan dan Perubahan Iklim (P3SEKPI).
Fatem, S. M., Awang, S. A., Pudyatmoko, S., Sahide, M. A., Pratama, A. A., & Maryudi, A. (2018). Camouflaging economic development agendas with forest conservation narratives: A strategy of lower governments for gaining authority in the re-centralising Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 78, 699-710. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.018
Freeman, O. E., Duguma, L. A., & Minang, P. A. (2015). Operationalizing the integrated landscape approach in practice. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 1-19. http://doi.org/ 10.5751/ES07175-200124
Giessen, L., & Krott, M. (2009). Forestry Joining Integrated Programmes? A question of willingness, ability and opportunities. Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitung, 180(5-6), 94-100.
Harvey, C. A., Chacon, M., Donatti, C. I., Garen, E., Hannah, L., Andrade, A., ... & Wollenberg, E. (2014). Climate-smart landscapes: opportunities and challenges for integrating adaptation and mitigation in tropical agriculture. Conservation Letters, 7(2), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12066
Hengeveld, G. M., Sch?ll, E., Trubins, R., & Salln?s, O. (2017). Forest Landscape Development Scenarios (FoLDS)-A framework for integrating forest models, owners' behaviour and socio-economic developments. Forest policy and Economics, 85, 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.007
Hogl, K. (2002). Reflections on inter-sectoral co-ordination in national forest programmes. In P?ivinen, R., Korhonen, M., & Pajari, B. (Eds.), Cross-Sectoral Policy Impacts on Forests (pp. 75-90). EFI Proceedings No. 46. European Forest Institute.
Kalimantan Forest Project (KalFor). (2018). Strengthening forest area planning and management. Retrieved from https://kalimantanforest.org/en/Kalimantan
Kartodihardjo, H., Nugroho, B., & Putro, H.R. (2011). Forest Management Unit (FMU) Development: Concept, Legislation, and Implementation. Ministry of Forestry Republic of Indonesia.
Kartodihardjo, H. (2017). Designation and regulation of essential ecosystem areas. In Sukara, E., Alikodra, H. S., Kartodihardjo, H., Putro, H. R., Roemantyo, R., & Pindi, S. (Eds.), Management of Essential Ecosystem Areas (pp. 101-11). Winrock International.
Kim, Y. S., Bae, J. S., Fisher, L. A., Latifah, S., Afifi, M., Lee, S. M., & Kim, I. A. (2016). Indonesia's forest management units: effective intermediaries in REDD+ implementation?. Forest Policy and Economics, 62, 69-77. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.09.004
Kumar, R. (2014). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (4th Edition). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Laraswati, D., Rahayu, S., Pratama, A. A., Soraya, E., Sahide, M. A., & Maryudi, A. (2020). Problem-method fit in forest policy analysis: Empirical pre-orientation for selecting tested or innovative social-qualitative methods. MethodsX, 7, 100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.100794
Maryudi, A. (2015). The political economy of forest land-use, the timber sector, and forest certification. In Romero, C., Putz, F. E., Guariguata, M. R., Sills, E. O., Maryudi, A., & Ruslandi, R. (Eds.), The Context of Natural Forest Management and FSC Certification in Indonesia (pp. 9-34). Occasional Paper 126. CIFOR.
McCarthy, J. F., Robinson, K., & Dhiaulhaq, A. (2018). Addressing Adverse Formalisation: The Land Question in Outer Island Indonesia. In Bedner, A., & Oomen, B. (Eds.), Real Legal Certainty and Its Relevance: Essays in honor of Jan Michiel Otto (pp. 28-45). Leiden University Press.
Milder, J. C., Hart, A. K., Dobie, P., Minai, J., & Zaleski, C. (2014). Integrated landscape initiatives for African agriculture, development, and conservation: a region-wide assessment. World Development, 54, 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev. 2013.07.006
Ministry of the Environment and Forestry / MoEF. (2020). The State of Indonesia's Forests 2020. MoEF.
Ministry of the Environment and Forestry / MoEF. (2022). Sinpasdok KPH+. Retrieved from http://kph.menlhk.go.id/sinpasdok/
Myers, R., Intarini, D., Sirait, M. T., & Maryudi, A. (2017). Claiming the forest: Inclusions and exclusions under Indonesia's 'new' forest policies on customary forests. Land Use Policy, 66, 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.039
Peluso, N. L. (1995). Whose woods are these? Counter‐mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode, 27(4), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 14678330.1995.tb00286.x
Pillkahn, U. (2008). Using Trends and Scenarios as Tools for Strategy Development: Shaping the Future of Your Enterprise. John Wiley & Sons.
Rahayu, S., Laraswati, D., Pratama, A. A., Permadi, D. B., Sahide, M. A., & Maryudi, A. (2019). Research trend: Hidden diamonds-The values and risks of online repository documents for forest policy and governance analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 100, 254-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.009
Ramdhaniaty, N., Tillah, M., Andriani, D., & Kartodihardjo, H. (2019). Belajar dari Pra dan Pasca Hutan Adat di Indonesia: Menuju Percepatan Hutan Adat yang Berkualitas (Studi di Tujuh Lokasi Hutan Adat). Rimbawan Muda Indonesia.
Reed, J., Ickowitz, A., Chervier, C., Djoudi, H., Moombe, K., Ros-Tonen, M., ... & Sunderland, T. (2020). Integrated landscape approaches in the tropics: A brief stock-take. Land Use Policy, 99, 104822. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.landusepol.2020.104822
Barr, C., Resosudarmo, I. A., Dermawan, A., & Setiono, B. (2006). Decentralization's effects on forest concessions and timber production. In Barr, C. M., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Dermawan, A., McCarthy, J., Moeliono, M., & Setiono, B. (Eds.)., Decentralization of forest administration in Indonesia: Implications for forest sustainability, economic development, and community livelihoods (pp. 87-107). CIFOR.
Riggs, R. A., Sayer, J., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A. K., Langston, J. D., & Sutanto, H. (2016). Forest tenure and conflict in Indonesia: Contested rights in Rempek Village, Lombok. Land Use Policy, 57, 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.landusepol.2016.06.002
Ros-Tonen, M. A., Reed, J., & Sunderland, T. (2018). From synergy to complexity: the trend toward integrated value chain and landscape governance. Environmental Management, 62(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1055-0
Sahide, M. A. K., & Giessen, L. (2015). The fragmented land use administration in Indonesia: Analysing bureaucratic responsibilities influencing tropical rainforest transformation systems. Land Use Policy, 43, 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landusepol.2014.11.005
Sahide, M. A. K., Supratman, S., Maryudi, A., Kim, Y. S., & Giessen, L. (2016a). Decentralisation policy as recentralisation strategy: forest management units and community forestry in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 18(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816818206168
Sahide, M. A. K., Maryudi, A., Supratman, S., & Giessen, L. (2016b). Is Indonesia utilising its international partners? The driving forces behind Forest Management Units. Forest Policy and Economics, 69, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol. 2016.04.002
Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M., Nasri, N., Dharmiasih, W., Verheijen, B., & Maryudi, A. (2020a). Anticipating a new conservation bureaucracy? Land and power in Indonesia's Essential Ecosystem Area policy. Land Use Policy, 97, 104789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104789. 104789
Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Erbaugh, J. T., Intarini, D., Dharmiasih, W., Makmur, M., ... & Maryudi, A. (2020b). The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access-exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes. Forest Policy and Economics, 120, 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102290
Sandker, M., Campbell, B. M., Ruiz-P?rez, M., Sayer, J. A., Cowling, R., Kassa, H., & Knight, A. T. (2010). The role of participatory modeling in landscape approaches to reconcile conservation and development. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03400-150213
Satuan Kelembagaan STP REDD+ Indonesia. (2012). Strategi Nasional REDD+. Satgas REDD+ Indonesia.
Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J. L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., ... & Buck, L. E. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(21), 8349-8356. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1210595110
Sayer, J. A., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A. K., Sunderland, T., Langston, J. D., Reed, J., ... & Purnomo, A. (2017). Measuring the effectiveness of landscape approaches to conservation and development. Sustainability Science, 12, 465-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0415-z
Sch?ll, E., & Hoogstra-Klein, M. A. (2017). Introduction to the special issue on ?Scenario analysis for forest policy and forest management-New insights and experiences". Forest Policy and Economics, 85, 217-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol. 2017.10.005
Simarmata, R. (2019). The enforceability of formalised customary land rights in Indonesia. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 19(2), 299-313.
Sirajuddin, Z., Fitriaty, P., & Shen, Z. (2022). Pengataa, ToKaili Customary Spatial Planning: A record of tropical settlements in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 6(2), 547-569. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v6i2.14310
Subadrudi, E.S. (2019). Pencapaian Target NDC dan Peran Swasta. In Ekawati, S., Dharmawan, I. W. S., Wardoyo, W., Rusolono, T., Anwar, S., & Subarudi, S. (Eds.), Membumikan program REDD+ di Kalimantan Timur (pp. 17-26). IPB Press.
Tempo. (2019). KLHK Dorong KPH Jadi Pendamping Hutan Sosial. Accessed March 20 2022, from https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1219256/klhk-dorong-kph-jadi-pendamping-hutan-sosial
Timmins, H. (2017). Opsi Legal Perlindungan Hutan pada Lahan Zona Pertanian di Indonesia. TFT.
Tropenbos Indonesia. (2019). Konservasi di Luar Kawasan Konservasi (KEE): Pembelajaran dari Kalimantan Barat. Tropenbos Indonesia.
United Nations Development Programme [UNDP Indonesia]. (2020). Forest Area Planning & Management in Kalimantan (KalFor). Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/content/indonesia/en/home/projects/hydrofluorocarbonshaseout-management-plan--hpmp-11
United States Agency for International Development [USAID]. (2019). Briefing Paper: Potret Pembangunan Kawasan Ekosistem Esensial (KEE) di Indonesia. USAID.
United States Agency for International Development [USAID]. (2020). Pendekatan Multi stakeholder Tingkatkan Pengelolaan Kawasan Ekosistem Esensial. Bijak Bul. USAID VII(July-September).
Van der Muur, W. (2018). Forest conflicts and the informal nature of realizing indigenous land rights in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 160-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445495
Zhu, J., & Simarmata, H. A. (2015). Formal land rights versus informal land rights: Governance for sustainable urbanization in the Jakarta metropolitan region, Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 43, 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol. 2014.10.016
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
