Implementation of Social Forestry Policy: A Review of Community Access
Additional Files
Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /home/journal33/public_html/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.inc.php on line 49
The issuance of social forestry licence and the achievement of benefits to the community in the post-licensing stage are still obstacles and difficulties for the community which is demanding the community access. The research aims to analyze the access of the community of social forestry licence holders in the pre-licence and post-licensing stages through field studies in forest community of Beringin Jaya Lampung and people’s forest plantation of Hajran Jambi qualitatively. In the pre-licence stage, the two license holder communities have the same access to all members who will be involved, information, facilitator, and government authorities. In the post-licensing stage, Beringin Jaya community has higher access to all members, facilitator, information, knowledge, government authorities, capital, technology, programs/activities of agencies and local markets, compared to Hajran community. Access to these matters is carried out by the community and facilitated by facilitator by linking the community to those who control these matters –which are not adequately provided by social forestry policies– through processes, mechanisms and social relationships. Successful facilitation of access requires networked capacity among community members and networking with other parties outside the community. The high level of access and networking capacity of community to obtain benefits from the implementation of social forestry policies must be supported by the suitability of subject-objects in granting licence at the pre-licence stage and the availability of supporting infrastructure.
Agrawal, A., & Chhatre, A. (2006). Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Development, 34(1), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.013
Agung, R., Rahayu, Y., Saputro, T., Tjandrakirana, R., Ramdhany, D., Wibawa, M., Silitonga, T. C. R., Damarraya, A., Wulandari, E. Y., Anisah, L. N., et al. (2018). Status hutan dan kehutanan Indonesia 2018 (Nurbaya, S., Awang, S. A., Efransjah). Jakarta: Ministry of Environment and Forestry Republic of Indonesia. https://www.menlhk.go.id/site/download
Anugrahsari, I., Sardjono, M. A., Fitriyah, N., & Golar, G. (2020). Social contracts: Pillars of community conservation partnerships in Lore Lindu National Park, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 4(1), 115-126. http://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i1.8682
Ardi. (2011). Pengembangan institusi pengelolaan hutan tanaman rakyat pola agroforestri (studi kasus Lamban Sigatal, Kabupaten Sarolangun Jambi). Dissertation. Bogor: IPB University. https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/83100
Basrin, E. (2017). Pengembangan ekonomi berbasis masyarakat melalui ragam inovasi dan investasi UMKM Kehutanan. In Eghenterr C., Suhardjito D., Purwanto E., Kleden E., Basrin E., Butar F.B., Galudra G., Subagio H., Yogaswara H., Sirait M. T., Iswari P., Rakhma S., Herwati M., Kartodihardjo H., & Maimunah S. Mewujudkan hak rakyat: Reformasi penguasaan tanah dan pengelolaan hutan. Kumpulan Naskah Akademik Konferensi Tenurial 2017. Jakarta: Sekretariat RAPS.
Baynes, J., Herbohn, J., Smith C., Fisher, R., & Bray, D. (2015). Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries. Global Enviromental Change, 35, 226-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.011
Besta, N. A. (2013). Seaweed farming and intra-household gender relations on Songo Songo Island, Tanzania. Dissertation. Norwich: University of East Anglia. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/19905462.pdf
Bong, I. W., Moeliono, M., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2019). What is success? Gaps and trade-offs in assessing the performance of traditional social forestry systems in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 3(1), 1-21. http://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5184
Cardozo, M. L. (2013). Smallholder livelihoods and market accessibility in the Peruvian Amazon. Dissertation. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/20951
Charnley, S., & Poe, M. R. (2007). Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now?. Annual Review of Anthropology. 36, 301-336. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123143
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Edisi 4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Cummins, A., & Yamaji, E. (2019). To see invisible rights: Quantifying Araman informal tenure and its immediate relationship with social forestry in Central Java, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 3(2), 193-201. http://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i2.6289.
de Royer, S., Juita, R., Galudra, G., & Pradhan, U. (2015). Are Village Forest Licenses for Rural Development or Conservation? A case study from Jambi Province, Indonesia. ICRAF Brief, (53). Bogor: ICRAF Southeast Asia Regional Program. Retrieved from http://www.worldagroforestry.org/publication/are-village-forest-licenses-rural-development-or-conservation-case-study-jambi-province
de Royer, S. & Juita, R. (2016). Village forest licenses (Hutan Desa) in West Kalimantan: Way forward for equity and land security?. ICRAF Brief, (58). Bogor: ICRAF Southeast Asia Regional Program. http://www.worldagroforestry.org/publication/village-forest-licenses-hutan-desa-west-kalimantan-way-forward-equity-and-land-security
Dyke, A. J. (2006). The Practice, politics and ecology of non timber forest products in Scotland. Dissertation. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/5632/
Ellis, A. M. (2016). Wabanaki access to sweetgrass (Hierochloe odorata) within Coastal Maine’s diminishing open land tradition. Dissertation. Maine: University of Maine. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2531/
Fisher, M. R., Moeliono, M., Mulyana, A., Yuliani, E. L., Adriadi, A., Judda, J., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2018). Assessing the new social forestry project in Indonesia: Recognition, livelihood and conservation?. International Forestry Review, 20(3), 346-361. http://doi.org/10.1505/146554818824063014
Fisher, M. R., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2019). The politics, economies, and ecologies of Indonesia’s third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section. Forest and Society, 3(1), 152-170. http://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6348
Gorriz-Mifsud, E., Secco, L., & Pisani, E. (2016). Exploring the Interlinkages between governance and social capital: A dynamic model for forestry. Forest Policy and Economic, 65, 25-36. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.01.006
Galudra, G. (2019). Focusing on facilitation: Issues and challenges of capacity development in Indonesia’s social forestry reforms. Forest and Society, 3(1), 133-136. http://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5995
Kartodihardjo, H., Nugroho, B., Rohadi, D., Suharjito, D., & Dermawan, A. (2011). Community plantation forests in Indonesia: Challenges and policy recommendations. Bogor: CIFOR. Retrieved from https://www.cifor.org/library/3666/
Kartodihardjo, H. (2017a). Masalah dan Kebijakan Nasional Keanekaragaman Hayati: Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dalam Kontestasi Kepentingan. Jakarta: Yayasan Kehati [unpublished].
Kartodihardjo, H. (2017b). Analisis Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam: Diskursus, Politik, Aktor, Jaringan. Bogor: Firdaus, Sajogjo Institute, Yayasan Auriga, RMI, P4W-IPB dan PSA-IPB.
[MoEF] Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2017). Laporan Kinerja Tahun 2016. Jakarta: Ministry of Forestry Republic of Indonesia. https://www.menlhk.go.id/site/single_post/1601
[KORUT] Konsorsium Kota Agung Utara. (2017). Pengembangan Sistem Pengelolaan Informasi Pengelola Hutan Kemasyarakatan (HKm) di Kabupaten Tanggamus Lampung. KORUT, TFCA Sumatera and Lampung University. Lampung: KORUT [unpublished].
Larson, A. M., Barry, D., & Dahal, G. R. (2010). New rights for forest-based communities? Understanding processes of forest tenure. International Forest Review, 12(1), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.12.1.78
Milgroom, J. (2012). Elephants of democracy: An unfolding process of resettlement in the Limpopo national park. Dissertation. Wageningen: Wageningen University. https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/elephants-of-democracy-an-unfolding-process-of-resettlement-in-th
Milgroom, J., Giller, K. E., & Leeuwis C. (2014). Three interwoven dimensions of natural resource use: Quantity, quality and access in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area. Human Ecology, 42(2). http://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9635-3
Moeliono, M., Thuy, P., Waty Bong, I., Wong, G., & Brockhaus, M. (2017). Social Forestry - why and for whom? A comparison of policies in Vietnam and Indonesia. Forest and Society, 1(2), 78-97. http://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.2484
Myers, R. (2015). Access in a global rattan production network: A case study of rattan originating from central Sulawesi, Indonesia and upgraded for sale in international markets. Dissertation. Norwich: University of East Anglia. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/58546/
Myers, R. & Hansen, C. P. (2019). Revisiting A Theory of Access: A review. Society of Natural Resources, 33(2), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1560522
Ostrom, E., & Nagendra, H. (2006). Insights on linking forests, tress, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratoris. The National Academy of Science, 103(1), 224-231. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607962103
Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2009). The Meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. in Handbook of Social Capital. Political Science and Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pagdee, A., Kim, Y. S., & Daugherty, P. J. (2006). What makes community forest management successful: A meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society of Natural Resources, 19, 33-52. https://10.1080/08941920500323260
Prijono, A. (2017). Berbagai Ruang Kelola: Kisah dan Pesan Hutan Kemasyarakatan Tanggamus. Jakarta: TFCA Sumatera. Retrieved from http://tfcasumatera.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Berbagi-Ruang-Kelola-Kisah-dan-Pesan-Hutan-Kemasyarakatan-Tanggamus.pdf
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A Theory of Access. Rural of Sociology. 68(2), 153-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
Salampessy, M. L., Febryano, I. G., & Zulfiani, D. (2017). Bound by debt: Nutmeg trees and changing relations between farmers and agents in a Moluccan agroforestry systems. Forest and Society, 1, 137-143. http://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.1718
Santoso, T. (2019). Lima hutan, satu cerita. Jakarta: Yayasan Perkasa Hijau.
Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Erbaugh, J. T., Intarini, D., Dharmiasih, W., Makmur, M., Faturachmat, F., Verheijen, B., & Maryudi, A. (2020). The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access-exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes. Forest Policy and Economics, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102290
Schwandt, T. A. (1997). Pendekatan Konstruktivis-Interpretivis dalam penelitian manusia. In Denzin, K. N., & Lincoln, Y. S. Handbook of Qualitative Research (146-170). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249-262. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146375
Sirimorok, N., & Rusdianto, E. (2020). Conditions for success in a community based conservation initiative: An analysis of triggering moments and catalytic elements in Nuha. Forest and Society, 4(1), 127-141. http://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i1.8184
Sunderlin, W. D., Hatcher, J., & Liddle, M. (2008). From exclusion to ownership? challanges and opportunities in advancing forest tenure reform. Washington DC: RRI. https://rightsandresources.org/wp-content/exported-pdf/fromexclusionfinal.pdf
Supriyanto, B. (2019). Catatan dari Tepi Hutan. Jakarta: Tempo Publishing.
Syafitri, M. A. (2010). Forest Tenure in Indonesia: the socio-legal challenges of securing communities'right. Leiden: Leiden University. Dissertation. https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/16242
Tashakori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Mixed Methodology: Mengkombinasikan Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta.
Titscher, S., Mayer, M., Wodak, E., & Vetter, E. (2009). Metode Analisis Teks dan Wacana. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Copyright (c) 2021 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
