When Acehnese Meets English: An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis of Phonological Interference in Multilingual Learners at IAIN Langsa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v9i2.50878Keywords:
Multilingualism, Linguistic interference, Optimality theoryAbstract
Multilingualism in Indonesia is a daily reality, with individuals frequently shifting between languages and dialects. At Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Langsa, students in the English Education Department embody this dynamic environment, speaking Acehnese (L1), Bahasa Indonesia (L2), and English (L3). This study investigates how Optimality Theory explains the phonological patterns shaped by multilingual interaction. Data were collected through fieldwork, interviews, and audio recordings of four students, focusing on phonological interference and multilingual dynamics. Findings reveal that language contact strongly influences English pronunciation. The Acehnese phonological system, in particular, affects how learners articulate English sounds. The most consistent interference involves the voiceless alveolar stop /t/, which is aspirated as [tʰ] in word-initial and medial positions but not in final position. Examples include table /ˈteɪ.bəl/ → [ˈtheɪ.bəl], cutie /ˈkjuː.ti/ → [ˈkjuː.thi], and tooth /toːθ/ → [toːθ], with /θ/ often replaced by [t]. These patterns highlight systematic transfer of phonetic features—aspiration, intonation, and accent—from L1 into English. Such interference complicates mastery of English phonology, underscoring the profound role of L1 influence in multilingual speech production and the challenges learners face in aligning with target-language norms.
References
Alkhudiry, R. I., & Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H. (2020). Analysing EFL Discourse of Saudi EFL Learners: Identifying Mother Tongue Interference. The Asian ESP Journal, 89–109.
Adinda, R., Sosrohadi, S., Syafitri, B. A., & Andini, C. (2025). Cognitive And Cultural Barriers In Synonim Acquisition: A Psycolinguistic Study Of Indonesian Learners Of Korean. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(4), 881-888.
Andini, C., Youngsun, K., Sunnuraini, S., & Warouw, D. S. (2026). Developing a Chunk-Based Learning Model to Improve Korean Speaking Skills for Beginner Learners. International Journal of L2CT, 1(2), 156-172.
Ansell, J., & Phillips, M. J. (1994). Practical Methods for Reliability Data Analysis (No. 14). Oxford University Press.
Arifin W. L. (2016). Interference: It’s Role in Target Language Mastery to Indonesian Learners. Register Journal, 4(1).
Asba, A. R., Evita, A. L., Rahman, F., & Nur, N. (2020, October). The globalizing of copra and coconut oil industry of Makassar before the second world war. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 575, No. 1, p. 012094). IOP Publishing.
Baghirova, S. M. (2021). The Kinds of the Linguistic Interference. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(2), 176–181.
Calabria, M., Costa, A., Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J. (2018). Neural Basis of Bilingual Language Control. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1426(1), 221–235.
Carson, L. (2016). The Sights and Sounds of the Multilingual City. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dewaele, J. M., Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2018). Effects of Trait Emotional Intelligence and Socio-biographical Variables on Communicative Anxiety and Foreign Language Anxiety Among Adult Multilinguals: A Review and Empirical Investigation. Language Learning, 58(4),911–960.
Gussenhoven, C., & Jacobs, H. (2017). Understanding Phonology. Routledge.
Holmes, J. (1994). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York. Longman Publishing.
Kager, R. (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Kaharuddin, Rahman, F., Abbas, A., & Hasjim, M. (2025). The vowel structure of Proto-Makassar: A phonological reconstruction of five dialects. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(3).
Kelly-Holmes, H. (2014). Linguistic Fetish: The Sociolinguistics of Visual Multilingualism. Visual Communication, 4, 135–151.
Lamont, A. (2021). Optimality Theory Implements Complex Functions with Simple Constraints. Phonology, 38(4), 729–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675721000361.
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A Unified Model of Language Acquisition in Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, eds Kroll J. F.,De Groot A. M. B. (Oxford). Oxford University Press.
Nair, R. B. (2003). A Troika For 21st-Century Indian Linguistics: Pragmatics, Cognition, and Language Acquisition. In Language Studies in India: Cognition, Structure, Variation. Springer Nature Singapore.
Pratiwi, N. I., Sosrohadi, S., Rahman, F., Dalyan, M., Andini, C., & Muliyani. (2026). The use of code-mixing by edu-influencers in social media: A communication strategy in sociolinguistic perspective. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), 11(1), 1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11010088
Prihandoko, L. A., Al Ahmad, A. S. M., Fredy, F., & Rahman, F. (2022). Multi-regression analysis of factors influencing perceived academic writing competence (PAWC) of Vocational School Students. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 16(2), 329-348.
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader, 1–71.
Puig-Mayenco, E., González Alonso, J., & Rothman,J. (2020). A Systematic Review of Transfer Studies in Third Language Acquisition. Second Language Research, 36(1), 31–64.
Rahman, F. (2024, May). Cyber Literature and ChatGPT in the Global of IoT Connectivity. In 4th International Conference on Linguistics and Culture (ICLC-4 2023) (pp. 344-348). Atlantis Press.
Raza, M. H. & Suhery, D. (2019). A Phonological Property of Syllable Structure and Economy in Urdu: An OT Account. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 80–84.
Suhery, D., Meutia, C. I., Raza, M.H & Idami, Z. (2023). Interlingual Interference in Multilingual Students: An Optimality Theory Approach. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 9(3), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.9.3.8875.275-283.
Suhery, D, & Raza, M. H. (2019). An Optimality Theory Account of English Loanwords in Pilibhit Hindi-Urdu (Uttar Pradesh) India. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 8(5c). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1108.0585C19.
Swandayani, N. E., Rahman, F., Sulastri, T., & Sosrohadi, S. (2026). The Use of Language Styles in Multimodal Texts on the Facebook Account †œHTâ€. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 11(1), 447-456.
Syafutri, T., & Saputra, A. (2021). The First Language Interference toward Students’ English Speaking as Foreign Language. Linguists: Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 7(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v7i1.4327
Vogt, H. (1954). Language Contacts. Word,10(2–3), 365–74
Wafa, A., & Wijayanti, S. (2018). Signs of Multilingualism at Religious Places in Surabaya: A Linguistic Landscape Study. 228 (Klua), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.2991/klua-18.2018.5
Weinreich, U. (1953). Language in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague Mouton.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dedy Suhery, Zahratul Idami, Israul Husna, Muhd Hamid Raza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
