Online Task-Based Language Teaching and Face-to-Face TBLT Utilizing SIKOLA in Writing Class: How does It Affect EFL Students’ Writing Performance and Attitude?

Authors

  • Marleiny Radjuni Hasanuddin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i2.27004

Keywords:

EFL Students, Face-to-Face, Language Teaching, SIKOLA, Writing Class

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the online task-based language teaching (TBLT) and face-to-face learning affects EFL learners' writing performance and attitude. The study focused on the application TBLT in teaching writing using two methods: online learning with SIKOLA platform and face-to-face learning which had only recently been developed. This research used mixed-methods. This study included one class of twenty-four undergraduate students (aged 19-21). Students were asked to complete the tasks online and face-to-face using the LMS SIKOLA, which has been used throughout the semesters at the university. The study discovered that students had positive attitudes toward the use of online task-based language teaching in terms of providing better drafts and revision. The study also discovered that there was a strong understanding of the procedures for carrying out the task-based assessments. In other words, they found out themselves that these methods can improve their performance in writing such as writing better drafts and revisions. The findings will help EFL students understand the procedures of online TBLT and face-to-face TBLT strategies in writing classes. Learners are encouraged to actively participate in both online and face-to-face learning discussions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, R., Amani, S., Newton, J., & Alwi, N. (2014). Planning and production in computer-mediated communication (CMC) writing. In H. Brynes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Language learning- insights from and for L2 learning (pp. 137-162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Al-Maqtri, M. A. T. (2014). How effective is e-learning in teaching English? A case study. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 647-669.

Ardiasih, L. S., Emzir, & Rasyid, Y. (2019). Online collaborative writing technique using Wiki: How effective is it to enhance learners’ essay writing?. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(1), 531-546. doi: 10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.2.6.531

Bailey, D. R., & Judd, C. (2018). The effects of online collaborative writing and TOEIC writing test- preparation on L2 writing performance. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), 383-397. doi: 10.18823/ asiatefl.2018.15.2.8.383

Bailey, S. (2011). Academic writing: A handbook for international students (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Baralt, M., & Gomez, J. M. (2017). Task-based language teaching online: A guide for teachers. Language Learning and Technology, 21(3), 28-43.

Bartley, S.J., & Golek, J. H. (2004). Evaluating the cost of effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 167-175.

Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Calvert, M., & Sheen, Y. (2014). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research, 8, 1-19. doi: 10.1177/1362168814547037

Cheung, Y. L. (2016). Teaching writing. In W. A. Renandya & H. P. Widodo (Eds.), English language teaching today: Building a closer link between theory and practice (pp. 1-20). New York: Springer International.

Cullen, R., Kullman, J., & Wild, C. (2013). Online collaborative learning on an ESL teacher education programme. ELT Journal, 67(4), 425-434. doi: 10.1093/elt/cct032

Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2029). ICT in ELT: How did we get there and where were we going?. ELT Journal, 66(4), 533-542. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccs050

Ellis, R. (2017). Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Lang. Teach, 50(4), 507- 526. doi: 10.1017/S0261444817000179

Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factors, and suggestions. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(2), 81-92. doi: 10.20547/jess04 21604201

Haro, A. V., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2019). The effects of an online learning environment with worked examples and peer feedback on students’ argumentative essay writing and domain-specific knowledge acquisition in the field of biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 390-398. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2018.1472132

Hidayati, K. H., (2018). Teaching writing to EFL learners: An investigation of challenges confronted by Indonesian teachers, Langkawi. Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 4(1), 21-31. doi: 10.31332/lkw.v4i1.772

Hockly, N. (2015). Developments in online language learning. ELT Journal, 69(3), 308-313. doi: 10. 1093/elt/ccv020

Hockly, N. (2016). Special educational needs and technology in language learning. ELT Journal, 70(3), 332-338. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccw033

Iveson, J. (2015). Challenges of task-based language teaching in online and blended learning contexts. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 277-282. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccw033

Jarvis, H. (2015). From PPP and CALL/MALL to praxis of task-based teaching and mobile assisted language use. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 19(1), 1-9.

Jurčenko, A. (2015). Applying task-based language learning method for teaching vocabulary. Rural Environment Education Personality, 5, 423-428.

Liu, X., Zheng, D., & Chen, Y. (2019). Latent classes of smartphone dictionary users among Chinese EFL learners: A mixed-method inquiry into motivation for mobile assisted language learning. International Journal of Lexicography, 32(1), 68-91. doi: 10.1093/ijl/ecy019

Long, M. H. (2016). In defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5-33. doi: 10.1017/S0267190515000057

Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309-319.

Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2014). Promoting foreign language collaborative writing through the use of Web 2.0 tools and tasks. In M. Gonzalez-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBL (pp. 115-148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Park, M. (2012). Implementing computer-assisted task-based language teaching in the Korean secondary EFL context. In A. Shehadeh & C. A. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts (pp. 215-240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). Effects of task complexity and planning conditions on L2 argumentative writing production. Discourse Processes, 8, 1-17. doi: 10.1177/1362168818761465

Sharma, P. (2006). Language learning online: Towards best practice using the web to support language learning. ELT Journal, 60(3), 309-312. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccl015

Sharma, P. (2008). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. ELT Journal, 62(1), 102-105. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccm086

Skehan, P. (2016). Tasks versus conditions: Two perspectives on task research and their implications for language pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 34-49. doi: 10.1017/S0267190515 000100

Vendityaningytas, V., & Styati, E. W. (2018). Effect of computer mediated communication and face-to- face communication on the students’ writing. Lingua Cultura, 12(3), 233-239. doi: 10.21512/ lc.v12i3.4235

Wellington, J. (2010). More than a matter of cognition: An exploration of affective writing problems of post- graduate students and their possible solutions. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 135-150. doi: 10.1080/13562511003619961

Willis, J. (2012). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-09

How to Cite

Radjuni, M. (2023). Online Task-Based Language Teaching and Face-to-Face TBLT Utilizing SIKOLA in Writing Class: How does It Affect EFL Students’ Writing Performance and Attitude?. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 6(2), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i2.27004

Issue

Section

Articles