Corporate Spheres of Responsibility: Architects, Cowboys, and Eco-Warriors in Myanmar's Oil & Gas Industry
Versions
- 2017-04-27 (2)
- 2017-04-27 (1)
Myanmar's recently opened economy is flush with incoming investment and activity. World leaders advocate that all businesses entering the country must operate in a "socially responsible manner." However, the history of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Myanmar is undefined, contradictory, and complex. Thus, to get a handle around what it means to be “responsible,” this paper investigates the collective way in which actors in the petroleum industry in Myanmar enact CSR from 1990 to 2014. The oil and gas (O&G) industry is the most lucrative, and arguably powerful, national sector. The practice and philosophy of CSR, which originated in this industry, is now proclaimed to be the starting point for this newly charted course of responsible business in Myanmar. Yet, activists and critics maintain that CSR is an insincere PR measure of profit maximization whereby companies can conduct business as normal. I argue that CSR in the Myanmar petroleum industry is influenced by more complex factors than profit maximization or image management. CSR initiatives are sculpted by (1) the geography of petroleum extraction, (2) corporate philosophies and company national origins, and (3) type of company operations. The petroleum industry’s CSR activities to date, in terms of geographic span and development targets, all fit into a spectrum of assumed spheres of corporate responsibility that have been forged by the corporate ‘architects’ and tempered by geographic and global forces.
Arakan Oil Watch. (2012). Burma's Resource Curse: The case for revenue transparency in the oil and gas sector. Thailand: Arakan Oil Watch.
Aye Myat. (2015, January). Myanmar Business Today. Retrieved from Myanmar to Promote International Energy Cooperation: https://goo.gl/dpNVJi
Barkan, J. (2013). Corporate Sovereignty: Law and Government under Capitalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Black, N. (2009). Blood Money: A Grounded Theory of Corporate Citizenship Myanmar (Burma) as a Case in Point. University of Waikato: A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements.
Bridge, G., & Le Billon, P. (2013). Oil. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Chevron. (2014). Notice of the 2014 Annual Meeting and 2014 Proxy Statement. Chevron.
CNPC. (2012). 2012 Corporate Social Responsibility Report. China National Petroleum Corporation.
Dellinger, L. (n.d.). Corporate Social Responsibility: A multifaceted Tool to Avoid Alien Tort Claims Act Litigation while simultaneously building a better business reputation. California Western International Law Journal, 40.
Doe v. Unocal Case History. (2012). Retrieved from EarthRights International: http://www.earthrights.org/legal/doe-v-unocal-case-history
Du, S., & Vieira, E. (2012). Striving for Legitimacy Through Corporate Social Responsibility: Insights from Oil Companies. Journal of Business Ethics.
EarthRights. (2004). Another Yadana: The Shwe Natural Gas Pipeline Project (Burma-Bangladesh-India). EarthRights International.
Epstein, C., & Barclay, K. (2013). Shaming to ‘green’: Australia–Japan relations and whales and tuna compared. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 95-123.
Ferguson, J. (2012). The Structures of Resbonsibility. Ethnography.
General Electric. (2013, July). GE Assistance for Myanmar. Retrieved from General Electric: http://3blmedia.com/News/CSR/GE-Assistance-Myanmar
Gilberthorpe, E., & Banks, G. (2012). Development on whose terms? CSR discourse and social realities in Papua New Guinea's extractive industries sector. Resource Policy.
Global Finance. (2015, July 22). Myanmar GDP and Economic Data. Retrieved from https://www.gfmag.com/global-data/country-data/myanmar-gdp-country-report
Godfrey, P. C. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and share holder value: An empirical test of the risk managment hypothesis. Strategic Management Jounral, 30(4), 425 - 445.
Haalboom, B. (2012). The intersection of corporate social responsibility guidelines and indigenous rights: Examining neoliberal governance of a proposed mining project in Suriname. Geoforum, 43(5), 969-979
Holliday, I. (2005). The Yadana Syndrome? Big Oil and Principles of Corporate Engagement. Asian Journal of Political Science, Volume 2.
Lall, V. (2012, October 22). Why CSR matters in new Myanmar. Retrieved from The Myanmar Times: https://goo.gl/TVRT0P
Lee, M.-D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews.
Mitchell, T. (2013). Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso.
Myanmar Centre for Responsible Business. (2014). Responsible Business, CSR and oil/gas and power contracts in Myanmar. Yangon: MCRB.
Myanmar Profile. (2014). Retrieved from BBC News: https://goo.gl/RSOzq1
Nebehay, S. (n.d.). Suu Kyi says Myanmar needs responsible investment. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/14/us-myanmar-swiss-suukyi-idUSBRE85C1NA20120614
Oxford Business Group. (2014). The Report: Myanmar . Oxford Business Group.
Peluso, N., & Watts, M. (2001). Violent Environments. Ithica: Cornell University.
Ra, S. T., & Griffin, B. (2014). Why CSR is the right tool to break into Myanmar markets. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/jhmRck
Rajak, D. (2011). In Good Company: An Anatomy of Corporate Social Responsibility. Stanford.
Shamir, R. (2010). Capitalism, governance, and authority: The case of corporate social responsibiliy. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 531-553.
Temphairojana, P. (2013, October 29). Despite low rating, Myanmar business climate improving - World Bank. Retrieved from Reuters: https://goo.gl/5tsK83
Transparency International. (2014). Corruption Perceptions Index. Retrieved from Transparency International: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2010/results
U.S. Campaign for Burma. (2012, January 7). Day #: Shwe Gas Movement. Retrieved from U.S. Campaign for Burma: https://goo.gl/A7JiOm
Welker, M. (2014). Enacting the Corporation.
World Bank. (2014, February 23). Myanmar Country Overview. Retrieved from World Bank: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/myanmar/overview
Copyright (c) 2019 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice