Collaboration as Method: Field Lessons from South Sulawesi, Indonesia and Khon Kaen, Thailand
Additional Files
Collaboration in the context of international fieldwork serves to elevate the skills of all members involved while simultaneously contributing to a robust body of observations. This paper reflects on methodological lessons from a Collaborative Southeast Asia Summer Field School where graduate and undergraduate students from Universitas Hasanuddin, Sulawesi, Indonesia (UNHAS), Khon Kaen University, Thailand (KKU), and University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, USA (UHM) came together to learn how to conduct research collaboratively. Guided by mentors from these three institutions, our multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural group participated in collaborative field schools at three field sites - two in South Sulawesi; and one in Khon Kaen, Thailand - where we continued, and built upon our local partners’ existing research projects and priorities in these areas. Each group focused on ‘following’ specific crops and commodities in different contexts, adopted and adapted multiple research methods, engaged with diverse team members and communities across various languages and landscapes, was guided by different fieldwork objectives and overarching questions, and yielded distinct findings. Despite these differences, all three groups shared a general aim to understand socio-economic and environmental transitions in Southeast Asian rural societies. Through collaborative and comparative reflections on challenges and adaptations before, during, and after fieldwork in both sites, this paper discusses how using collaboration as a research method has (re)shaped team members’ understandings of our research, Southeast Asia as a region, and ourselves. Importantly, we reflect on how this experience has shaped our future collaborative research in, and of Southeast Asia, and how we might apply these methodological lessons in our own research projects.
Araghi, F. A. (1995). Global Depeasantization, 1945–1990. The Sociological Quarterly, 36(2), 337-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1995.tb00443.x
De Volo, B. (2009). Participant observation, politics, and power relations: Nicaraguan mothers and US casino waitresses. In Schatz, E. (Ed.), Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of power (pp. 217-236). The University of Chicago Press.
Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (5th Edition). AltaMira Press.
Bernstein, H. (1977). Notes on capital and peasantry. Review of African political economy, 4(10), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056247708703339
Bernstein, H. (2010). Class dynamics of agrarian change. Kumarian Press.
Bryceson, D. F. (1996). Deagrarianization and rural employment in sub-Saharan Africa: A sectoral perspective. World Development, 24(1), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.10 16/0305- 750X(95)00119-W
Chann, S. (2024). A geographer's place matters: Reflections from a ‘local scholar’and the politics of North/South knowledge production. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49(2), e12661. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12661
Choenkwan, S., & Rambo, A. T. (2018). Identification of agricultural systems in the mountains of Northeast Thailand. Journal of Mountain Science, 15(2), 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4309-4
Collaborative Southeast Asia Field School. UH Mānoa Students Engage in Cross-Cultural Field School Experience in Southeast Asia. University of Hawai‘i. September 15, 2023. https://www.hawaii.edu/news/article.php?aId=12806
Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. Routledge.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd Edition). University of Chicago Press.
Dharmiasih, W., Fisher, M., Ni Luh Emi Dwiyanti, I Gede Yudha Bhismaya & Verheijen, B. (2021). Apertures of knowledge co-production: Facilitating multi-generational photovoices at Bali’s UNESCO Cultural Landscape. In Acabado, S. & Kuan, D. (Eds.), Indigenous Peoples, Heritage and Landscape in the Asia Pacific: Knowledge Co-Production and Empowerment (pp. 151-167). Routledge.
Fisher, M. (2021). Engaging voices in the landscape: Participatory geography in Indigenous land rights recognition. In Acabado, S. & Kuan, D. (Eds.), Indigenous Peoples, Heritage and Landscape in the Asia Pacific: Knowledge Co-Production and Empowerment (pp. 31-53). Routledge.
Gin, K. O. (2009). Southeast Asia Studies in Southeast Asia: Agenda for the Twenty-First Century. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 11(1), 426-46.
Golubchikov, O. (201..) Negotiating critical geographies through a “feel-trip”: Experiential, affective and critical learning in engaged fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309 8265.2014.1003800
Gullette, G., & Singto, S. (2018). Urban Expansion, Agrarian Shifts, and Decentralized Governance in Thailand's Isaan Region. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, 40(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/cuag.12090
Hau, C. (2020). For Whom Are Southeast Asian Studies? Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia, 56(2), 59-98.
Hope, M. (2009). The importance of direct experience: A philosophical defence of fieldwork in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260802276698
Heryanto, A. (2002). Can There Be Southeast Asians in Southeast Asian Studies?, Moussons, 5, 3-30. https://doi.org/10.4000/moussons.2658
Kimura, A. H., & Kinchy, A. (2016). Citizen science: Probing the virtues and contexts of participatory research. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2, 331-361. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2016.99
McMichael, P. (2012). Depeasantization. In Ritzer, G. (Ed.), The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization (pp. 1-2). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Molle, F., Floch, P., Promphakping, B., & Blake, D. J. H. (2009). The ‘Greening of Isaan’: Politics, Ideology and Irrigation Development in the Northeast of Thailand. In Molle, F., Foran, T., & Kakonen, M. (Eds.), Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance (pp. 253-282). Earthscan.
Mujetahid, A., Sirimorok, N., Faradiba Muin, A. V., Faturachmat, F., Supratman, S., Alam, S., ... & Dressler, W. H. (2023). On the Demise of Makkalice: Conservation Enclosure and the loss of a wealth-redistributing Harvest System in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Human Ecology, 51(4), 753-768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 10745-023-00421-0
Nairn, K. (2005). The problems of utilizing ‘direct experience’in geography education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 293-309. https://doi.org/10. 1080/03098260 500130635
Pepinsky, T. B. (2015). Disciplining Southeast Asian Studies. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 30(1), 215-226. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/577534
Podhisita, C. (2017). Household Dynamics, the Capitalist Economy, and Agricultural Change in Rural Thailand. Southeast Asian Studies, 6(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas. 6.2_247
Preston, L. (2016). Field'work'vs' feel'trip: Approaches to out-of-class experiences in geography education. Geographical Education (Online), 29, 9-22. https://search. informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.515628657853765
Promkhambut, A., Yokying, P., Woods, K., Fisher, M., Yong, M. L., Manorom, K., ... & Fox, J. (2023). Rethinking agrarian transition in Southeast Asia through rice farming in Thailand. World Development, 169, 106309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.world dev.2023.106309
Rambo, A. T. (2017). The Agrarian Transformation in Northeastern Thailand: A Review of Recent Research. Southeast Asian Studies, 6(2), 211–245. https://doi.org/ 10.20495/seas.6.2_211
Petpongpan, C., Ekkawatpanit, C., Bailey, R. T., Kositgittiwong, D., & Saraphirom, P. (2022). Evaluating surface water-groundwater interactions in consequence of changes in climate and groundwater extraction. Water Resources Management, 36(14), 5767-5783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03334-7
Saraphirom, P., Wirojanagud, W., & Srisuk, K. (2013). Potential Impact of Climate Change on Area Affected by Waterlogging and Saline Groundwater and Ecohydrology Management in Northeast Thailand. EnvironmentAsia, 6(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.14456/ea.2013.4
Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Bloomsbury Academic & Professional.
Tipa, G., & Panelli, R. (2009). Beyond ‘someone else's agenda’: An example of indigenous/academic research collaboration. New Zealand Geographer, 65(2), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7939.2009.01152.x
Umemoto, K. (2004). Walking in another’s shoes: Epistemological challenges in participatory planning. In Dialogues in urban and regional planning (pp. 196-224). Routledge.
Umemoto, K. (2001). Walking in another’s shoes: Epistemological challenges in participatory planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0739456X0102100102
White, B., Borras, S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Wolford, W. (2013). The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3-4), 619-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.691879
Winichakul. T. (2014). Asian Studies across Academies. Journal of Asian Studies, 73 (4), 879–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911814001065
Copyright (c) 2025 Forest and Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
