Connecting social forestry to conservation policies in Tanah Papua
Versions
- 2019-04-29 (2)
- 2019-04-29 (1)
Additional Files
Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /home/journal33/public_html/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.inc.php on line 49
Papua is the region with the largest remaining forest resources in Indonesia. This amounts to 42,224,840 hectares of forest areas, which in other words means that 95% of its total area is listed as forests. The breadth of forest coverage is formalized by Forestry Ministerial Decree of Indonesia no. 891/Kpts-II/1999 on the Designation of Provincial Forest Area and Inland Waters in Tanah Papua. Meanwhile, forest resources plays an important part of people’s lives in Tanah Papua and holds an important function among customary communities in Papua. Nevertheless, as yet there has been no meaningful social forestry program that provides direct benefits to communities. As a response to the special autonomy of Papua, several initiatives aimed at providing formal access and support services to local people in forest resource management. Ironically however, such initiatives are discouraged by the central government, arguing that they should originate from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Despite these circumstances, Tambrauw and West Papua have declared themselves to be a conservation district and conservation province, respectively. This article attempts to briefly portray the dynamics of these conservation initiatives and the possibilities of developing synergy with social forestry programming in Tambrauw District and West Papua Province.
Awang, S (Ed) (1999). Forest for People. Berbasis Ekosistem. Pustaka Hutan Rakyat. Yogyakarta. Brigraf Publishing.
Awang, S (2010). Kehutanan sosial berbasis reforma agraria.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological applications, 10(5), 1251-1262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
Berkes F. (2001). Religious Traditional and Biodiversity. Enclopedia of Biodiversity 5:109-120
Direktorat Jenderal Rehabilitasi Lahan dan Perhutanan Sosial (2006). Statistik Kehutanan. 2006. Departemen Kehutanan, Jakarta.
Fisher, M. R., Moeliono, M., Mulyana, A., Yuliani, E. L., Adriadi, A., Judda, J., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2018). Assessing the new social forestry project in Indonesia: recognition, livelihood and conservation?. International Forestry Review, 20(3), 346-361.doi:https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818824063014.
Fatem, S. M., Awang, S. A., Pudyatmoko, S., Sahide, M. A., Pratama, A. A., & Maryudi, A. (2018). Camouflaging economic development agendas with forest conservation narratives: A strategy of lower governments for gaining authority in the re-centralising Indonesia. Land use policy, 78, 699-710. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.018
Fatem, S. M., & Asem, G. (2015). Kabupaten konservasi sebagai political action pemerintah daerah dalam mendukung konservasi sumberdaya alam hayati: Studi kasus Kabupaten Tambrauw, Papua Barat. Pros Sem Nas Masy Biodiv Indon, 1(6), 1403-1410.
Gilmour J.A and Fisher R.J. (1991). Villagers, forests, and foresters: The philosophy, process, and practice of community forestry in Nepal. Research Publication. Forestry Sciences. Sahayogi Press.
Koalisi Anti Mafia Hutan. (2018). Half Hearted Recognition. A study on Permit of Timber Utilisation by Indegnous Peoples in Papua. Jakarta. Indonesia.
Laksono, P.M. (2005). Igyaser Hanjop di Kawasan Pegunungan Arfak Papua. Pusat Studi Asia Pasifik Ugm Jogjakarta.
Mampioper, D.A. and C. Ayomi (2008). Masyarakat Adat dan Lunturnya Nilai adapt: Ironisnya seringkali mereka dituding perjuangkan aspirasi merdeka. Tabloit Jubi. Available at http://tabloidjubi.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/masyarakat-adat-danlunturnya-nilai-adat-%E2%80%9
Maryudi, A. (2012). Restoring state control over forest resources through administrative procedures: Evidence from a community forestry programme in Central Java, Indonesia. Aust. J. South-East Asian Stud. 5 (2), 229-242.
McNeely J.A, Mainka S.A. (2009). Conservation for a New Era. IUCN, Gland Switzerland.
Patay, M., Sasmitawidjaya, V.S. (2005). Peluang Yang Memperlemah Posisi Masyarakat Adat. Yayasan Kemala. World Resources Institute. World Wildlife Fund. Indonesia Programme. Region Sahul Papua.
Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Maryudi, A., Dhiaulhaq, A., Wulandari, C., Kim, Y. S., & Giessen, L. (2018). Deadlock opportunism in contesting conservation areas in Indonesia. Land use policy, 77, 412-424.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.020
Suharman. (2004). Konflik Pengelolaan Hutan Kemasyarakatan di Kawasan Gunung Kidul. Dalam Konflik dan Kekerasan pada Aras Lokal, editor Fera Nugroho , Pustaka Percik. Salatiga.
Sukadaryati. (2006). Potensi Hutan Rakyat di Indonesia dan Permasalahannya. Makalah Prosiding Seminar Hasil Litbang Hutan “Kontribusi Hutan Rakyat dalam Kesinambungan Industri Kehutanan”. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan, Bogor.
Suryandari, E. Y . dan T . Puspitojati. (2003). Sistem Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat ; Keragaman dan Kelestarian. Buletin Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan (4) 2
Wanggai F. (1999). Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Alam Secara Rasional Dalam perspectife pemberdayaan masyarakat. Universitas Cenderawasih, Manokwari.
Copyright (c) 2019 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
