Application of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to Analyze Occupational Safety Risks in General Cargo Ship Loading and Unloading Activities at Makassar Port
Main Article Content
Abstract
Makassar Port as one of the main ports in Indonesia has an important role in the national logistics system, but the loading and unloading activities of general cargo ships have the potential for high occupational safety risks. This study aims to identify, evaluate, and prioritize risks that can occur during the loading and unloading process at Makassar Port. The analysis of occupational safety risks in the loading and unloading activities of general cargo ships uses the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis method approach by identifying the failure mode, the impact of failure, and the cause of failure that occurs at each stage of loading and unloading activities and involves the assessment of Severity, Occurrence, and Detection to determine the Risk Priority Number (RPN). Through the application of FMEA method, an in-depth identification of work stages, failure modes, effects, causes, and Risk Priority Number (RPN) values for each work activity is obtained. The results of the analysis that show the failure mode with the highest RPN value in this study are in the loading and unloading activities which then become a reference for designing mitigation steps or appropriate repair solutions by implementing a safety briefing before starting the activity, a safety area on the dock for activities, ensuring the load is in accordance with the capacity of the lifting equipment, training for heavy equipment operators, controlling or monitoring by the PnC team, communication and mutual coordination between operators and field workers. The conclusion of this study is that the approach using the FMEA method is effective in identifying and evaluating work safety risks in loading and unloading activities. With the results of risk mapping, the port can take more targeted preventive measures.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2026-02-10
Published 2026-02-15
References
[ 1] Government of the Republic of Indonesia, Government Regulation No. 61 of 2009 concerning Ports, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/api/download/FullText/2009/61TAHUN2009PP.htm
[ 2] B. Triatmodjo, Perencanaan Pelabuhan (Port Planning). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Beta Offset, 2009.
[ 3] Ministry of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia, Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. PM 51 of 2015, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://peraturan.infoasn.id/preview-pdf
[ 4] A. Djamaluddin, Port and Terminal Management. Makassar, Indonesia: UNHAS Press, 2023.
[ 5] A. Nurhadi, Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (Occupational Safety and Health). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Graha Ilmu, 2018.
[ 6] R. Salim and D. Budianto, Manajemen Pelabuhan dan Transportasi Maritim (Port Management and Maritime Transportation). Jakarta, Indonesia: Salemba Empat, 2014.
[ 7] M. Rafi, “Failure risk analysis in the 50 kg urea bagging process using FMEA method at PT Pupuk Kaltim,” Undergraduate Thesis, Malikussaleh University, Indonesia, 2024.
[ 8] J. Piątkowski and P. Kamiński, “Risk assessment of defect occurrences in engine piston castings by FMEA method,” Archives of Foundry Engineering, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 107–110, 2017, doi: 10.1515/afe-2017-0100.
[ 9] R. J. Rakesh, “FMEA analysis for reducing breakdowns of a subsystem in the life care product manufacturing industry,” International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 218–225, 2013.
[ 10] G. A. Ghivaris, K. Soemadi, and A. Desrianty, “Proposal to improve the quality of the rudder tiller production process at PT PINDAD Bandung using FMEA and FTA,” Jurnal Teknik Industri Itenas (Integra), vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2015
[ 11] H. Palippui, “Critical logistic loss in FPSO-tanker transfer process: Multistakeholder FMEA risk analysis,” Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 535–546, 2025, doi: 10.26748/KSOE.2025.043.